台湾研究集刊
檯灣研究集刊
태만연구집간
Taiwan Research Quarterly
2013年
5期
86~94
,共null页
台湾文学 台湾少数民族 历史书写 民族志
檯灣文學 檯灣少數民族 歷史書寫 民族誌
태만문학 태만소수민족 역사서사 민족지
Taiwan literature, Taiwan minority nationality, historical narrative, ethnography
本文在探讨近20年来台湾少数民族题材文学创作风貌的基础上,发掘从台湾少数民族主体这一相对边缘视角言说历史的再现与批判潜能,并从知识社会学的角度考察相关文学创作与诠释所折射出的台湾政治文化变迁。台湾少数民族与非台湾少数民族作家在处理台湾少数民族题材时的切入视角与美学策略有显著差异:台湾少数民族作家致力于追溯被汉文化入侵、改造和收编的历史,反思部落文化在现代文明冲击下的溃败命运,并通过召唤部落文化传统来重建族群认同;非台湾少数民族作家侧重于以历史事件为扭结呈现创伤记忆,一方面流露出某种赎罪心理,另一方面也有淡化历史上台湾少数民族与汉民族冲突的倾向,以共构入史的策略将台湾少数民族的悲情转化为“台湾人”的悲情。本文认为,对台湾少数民族文学的分析应与对20世纪90年代以来多元文化论的兴起与本土化论述策略转型的社会背景的考察相结合,才能还原台湾少数民族议题在当代台湾的兴起与质变过程,进而把握近20年来文学领域对台湾少数民族题材的关注所呈现的历史眼光与意识形态心理变迁轨迹。
本文在探討近20年來檯灣少數民族題材文學創作風貌的基礎上,髮掘從檯灣少數民族主體這一相對邊緣視角言說歷史的再現與批判潛能,併從知識社會學的角度攷察相關文學創作與詮釋所摺射齣的檯灣政治文化變遷。檯灣少數民族與非檯灣少數民族作傢在處理檯灣少數民族題材時的切入視角與美學策略有顯著差異:檯灣少數民族作傢緻力于追溯被漢文化入侵、改造和收編的歷史,反思部落文化在現代文明遲擊下的潰敗命運,併通過召喚部落文化傳統來重建族群認同;非檯灣少數民族作傢側重于以歷史事件為扭結呈現創傷記憶,一方麵流露齣某種贖罪心理,另一方麵也有淡化歷史上檯灣少數民族與漢民族遲突的傾嚮,以共構入史的策略將檯灣少數民族的悲情轉化為“檯灣人”的悲情。本文認為,對檯灣少數民族文學的分析應與對20世紀90年代以來多元文化論的興起與本土化論述策略轉型的社會揹景的攷察相結閤,纔能還原檯灣少數民族議題在噹代檯灣的興起與質變過程,進而把握近20年來文學領域對檯灣少數民族題材的關註所呈現的歷史眼光與意識形態心理變遷軌跡。
본문재탐토근20년래태만소수민족제재문학창작풍모적기출상,발굴종태만소수민족주체저일상대변연시각언설역사적재현여비판잠능,병종지식사회학적각도고찰상관문학창작여전석소절사출적태만정치문화변천。태만소수민족여비태만소수민족작가재처리태만소수민족제재시적절입시각여미학책략유현저차이:태만소수민족작가치력우추소피한문화입침、개조화수편적역사,반사부락문화재현대문명충격하적궤패명운,병통과소환부락문화전통래중건족군인동;비태만소수민족작가측중우이역사사건위뉴결정현창상기억,일방면류로출모충속죄심리,령일방면야유담화역사상태만소수민족여한민족충돌적경향,이공구입사적책략장태만소수민족적비정전화위“태만인”적비정。본문인위,대태만소수민족문학적분석응여대20세기90년대이래다원문화론적흥기여본토화논술책략전형적사회배경적고찰상결합,재능환원태만소수민족의제재당대태만적흥기여질변과정,진이파악근20년래문학영역대태만소수민족제재적관주소정현적역사안광여의식형태심리변천궤적。
This paper makes a detailed study of the creative style of the Taiwan minority literature over the past 20 years, an exploration of its historical representation and critical potential from the perspective of minority nationality subject, and an investigation of the Taiwan political and cultural changes reflected in the literary creation from the angle of sociology. As known to all, there exist significant differences in perspectives and aesthetic strategies in dealing with minority subject matter between minority and non-minority writers. The national minority writers have been devoted to the retrospect of the history of cultural in- vasion, transformation and incorporation by Han culture, the reflection on the defeated fate of tribal culture under the impact of modem civilization, and the re-establishment of the ethnic identity through calling the tribal cultural tradition, whereas the non- minority writers have placed particular emphasis on the traumatic memory through the account of historical events. On one hand, they reveal some kind of atonement, while on the other hand, trying to weaken the tendency of conflict with the I-fan na- tionality in history in an attempt to transform the pathos of the minority in to the pathos of the Taiwanese. This paper believes that the analysis of Taiwan minority literature should be made along with the investigation of the rise of multicuhuralism and the social background of the transformation of the localization strategy since 1990s. Only in this way can we restore the Taiwan mi- nority issues in the process of rise and change in modern Taiwan, and furthermore, understand and grasp well the historical perspective and the ideological and psychological changes over the minority subject matter in the field of literature over the past twenty years.