国土资源科技管理
國土資源科技管理
국토자원과기관리
Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources
2013年
5期
126~130
,共null页
郭欢欢 郑财贵 牛德利 庞静
郭歡歡 鄭財貴 牛德利 龐靜
곽환환 정재귀 우덕리 방정
土地管理 地票制度 土地发展权 重庆
土地管理 地票製度 土地髮展權 重慶
토지관리 지표제도 토지발전권 중경
land management; land quota system;land development rights;Chongqing
地票制度实施以来备受学术界高度关注,学界就地票制度的创新、存在的问题、改进措施等进行了广泛讨论。采用文献综述研究方法,在回顾地票制度研究现状基础上,对地票制度研究的一些热点问题进行辨析。研究结果表明:地票制度创新意义在于促进城乡资源的合理流动等;地票制度存在一定的问题,但可以通过在实践中不断调整政策解决;地票二级市场开放是必然趋势,但是必须认清二级市场开放的风险并制定风险规避策略;地票交易与土地流转有一定相似性,但不同于土地流转;“地票”翻译为“LandCoupon”更为合适;地票制度与土地发展权有一定差异,但并没有侵占落后地区的发展权。地票制度作为一种制度创新是值得肯定的,存在的问题需要在探索中不断完善。
地票製度實施以來備受學術界高度關註,學界就地票製度的創新、存在的問題、改進措施等進行瞭廣汎討論。採用文獻綜述研究方法,在迴顧地票製度研究現狀基礎上,對地票製度研究的一些熱點問題進行辨析。研究結果錶明:地票製度創新意義在于促進城鄉資源的閤理流動等;地票製度存在一定的問題,但可以通過在實踐中不斷調整政策解決;地票二級市場開放是必然趨勢,但是必鬚認清二級市場開放的風險併製定風險規避策略;地票交易與土地流轉有一定相似性,但不同于土地流轉;“地票”翻譯為“LandCoupon”更為閤適;地票製度與土地髮展權有一定差異,但併沒有侵佔落後地區的髮展權。地票製度作為一種製度創新是值得肯定的,存在的問題需要在探索中不斷完善。
지표제도실시이래비수학술계고도관주,학계취지표제도적창신、존재적문제、개진조시등진행료엄범토론。채용문헌종술연구방법,재회고지표제도연구현상기출상,대지표제도연구적일사열점문제진행변석。연구결과표명:지표제도창신의의재우촉진성향자원적합리류동등;지표제도존재일정적문제,단가이통과재실천중불단조정정책해결;지표이급시장개방시필연추세,단시필수인청이급시장개방적풍험병제정풍험규피책략;지표교역여토지류전유일정상사성,단불동우토지류전;“지표”번역위“LandCoupon”경위합괄;지표제도여토지발전권유일정차이,단병몰유침점락후지구적발전권。지표제도작위일충제도창신시치득긍정적,존재적문제수요재탐색중불단완선。
The system of land quota has attracted attention from domestic academic field since it was implemented in 2008. This paper summarizes the researches on land quota and discusses the hot issues about the land quota to promote healthy development of the system using the method of documentation. The results indicate that a) the land quota has promoted reasonable flow of resources between urban and rural areas, b) some problems exist in land quota system which can be solved by adjusting policy in practice, c) it is an inexorable trend to establish the secondary market of land quota however, we must recognize the risks and construct the risk aversion strategy, d) land quota transaction is somewhat similar to but different from land circulation, e) land quota is different from land development rights, and f) land quota hasn't prevented the development right of the backward areas. It is concluded that the land quota system should be affirmed as an innovation and need to be improved in practice.