高等建筑教育
高等建築教育
고등건축교육
Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning
2013年
5期
19~25
,共null页
思想政治理论课 政治认同 影响路径 结构方程建模(SEM)
思想政治理論課 政治認同 影響路徑 結構方程建模(SEM)
사상정치이론과 정치인동 영향로경 결구방정건모(SEM)
ideology and political theory course; political identity; influence paths; structural equation modeling
文章以大学生对执政党执政效能及执政价值的认同程度作为高校思想政治理论课(简称“理论课”)教学实效性的操作变量,并基于重庆市高校的调研,采用SEM法对理论课教学实效性进行实证研究,研究发现:第一,大学生对执政党的执政效能低度认同,对执政价值中度认同;第二,理论课教学对大学生的执政价值认同的影响路径有两条,即“直接路径”(理论课教学→执政价值认同)和“间接路径”(理论课教学→执政效能认同→执政价值认同),其中,间接路径影响力更大,而且,间接路径的效应主要由执政效能认同这一中介变量所贡献;第三,教学态度对执政价值认同的影响最大,其次是教学内容和教学形式.
文章以大學生對執政黨執政效能及執政價值的認同程度作為高校思想政治理論課(簡稱“理論課”)教學實效性的操作變量,併基于重慶市高校的調研,採用SEM法對理論課教學實效性進行實證研究,研究髮現:第一,大學生對執政黨的執政效能低度認同,對執政價值中度認同;第二,理論課教學對大學生的執政價值認同的影響路徑有兩條,即“直接路徑”(理論課教學→執政價值認同)和“間接路徑”(理論課教學→執政效能認同→執政價值認同),其中,間接路徑影響力更大,而且,間接路徑的效應主要由執政效能認同這一中介變量所貢獻;第三,教學態度對執政價值認同的影響最大,其次是教學內容和教學形式.
문장이대학생대집정당집정효능급집정개치적인동정도작위고교사상정치이론과(간칭“이론과”)교학실효성적조작변량,병기우중경시고교적조연,채용SEM법대이론과교학실효성진행실증연구,연구발현:제일,대학생대집정당적집정효능저도인동,대집정개치중도인동;제이,이론과교학대대학생적집정개치인동적영향로경유량조,즉“직접로경”(이론과교학→집정개치인동)화“간접로경”(이론과교학→집정효능인동→집정개치인동),기중,간접로경영향력경대,이차,간접로경적효응주요유집정효능인동저일중개변량소공헌;제삼,교학태도대집정개치인동적영향최대,기차시교학내용화교학형식.
Taking the party performance and value identity as indexes of the teaching effect of ideology and political theory course, we researched on the teaching effect of ideology and political theory course in universities and colleges by using structural equation modeling (SEM) based on our investigation in universities and colleges of Chongqing. The results show that: 1) University students hold low performance identity and middle value identity of the governing party; 2) The ideology and political theory course can influence university students from two paths which are the direct path ( the theory course--*value identity) and the indirect path ( the theory eourse---~performance identity---~value identity). The indirect path is more important and its effect is contributed mainly by the mediation variable performance identity; and 3) The teaching attitude have the most important impacts on value identity compared to teaching contents and teaching styles.