CAJ | 학술논문

美国联邦最高法院在原本是程序意义的“正当法律程序”条款中开掘出实质性维度，是美国社会进入自由资本主义阶段，意图摆脱固有法律束缚和政府规制实现经济自由发展的反应，是自由放任主义经济学理论、优胜劣汰的社会达尔文主义和契约自由的法学理论共同作用的结果。它的兴衰既是社会情势使然，又是司法能动与克制立场使然。它力图实现的并不是公民权利的绝对性和不受限制，而是公民权利尽可能少地受到政府的干预。
미국련방최고법원재원본시정서의의적“정당법률정서”조관중개굴출실질성유도，시미국사회진입자유자본주의계단，의도파탈고유법률속박화정부규제실현경제자유발전적반응，시자유방임주의경제학이론、우성렬태적사회체이문주의화계약자유적법학이론공동작용적결과。타적흥쇠기시사회정세사연，우시사법능동여극제립장사연。타력도실현적병불시공민권리적절대성화불수한제，이시공민권리진가능소지수도정부적간예。
The substantive due process of law, extracted by the U. S. Supreme Court from the ＂Due Process Clause＂ from the o riginal context of procedure, was the requirement of the society to get rid of the restrict of existing law and the regulation of the government, in order to achieve the free development of economy after the American society stepped into the period of competitive capitalism. It was derived from the Laissez faire economics theory, the Social Darwinism and legal theory of the freedom of con tract. The change of social situation, as well as the positive and negative attitude of judicial power, determined its prosperity and comedown. The goal of substantive due process of law theory was the less intervention on the civil rights from the government, rather than the absoluteness of civil rights.