中国体育科技
中國體育科技
중국체육과기
China Sport Science and Technology
2013年
6期
105~111
,共null页
损伤 预测 预防 信度 效度 功能性动作测试
損傷 預測 預防 信度 效度 功能性動作測試
손상 예측 예방 신도 효도 공능성동작측시
injury ; prediction ; prevention ; reliability ; validity ; FMS
在物理治疗关注动作、常规医务诊断和运动能力测试间存在脱节的背景下,功能性动作测试(FMS)由美国物理治疗师GrayCook发明,并广泛运用于体育、消防、军队和大众健身领域。由深蹲、跨栏、单跪、肩部柔韧、下肢柔韧、俯卧撑和体旋7个测试动作组成的FMS被认为可以诊断身体的灵活性和稳定性,达到预测和预防损伤的目的。尽管目前对FMS的研究不足,但是有限的研究表明,FMS具有较高的信度和效度。作为一种低成本、易操作、同时具有较高信度和效度的测试方法,FMS的出现丰富了测试内容,使测试获取的信息更加多元。建议后期有关FMS的研究,采用经验丰富的测试者、减少测试者的数量、选用大样本量的测试对象、规范对损伤的定义,以建立不同人群的FMS得分标准。
在物理治療關註動作、常規醫務診斷和運動能力測試間存在脫節的揹景下,功能性動作測試(FMS)由美國物理治療師GrayCook髮明,併廣汎運用于體育、消防、軍隊和大衆健身領域。由深蹲、跨欄、單跪、肩部柔韌、下肢柔韌、俯臥撐和體鏇7箇測試動作組成的FMS被認為可以診斷身體的靈活性和穩定性,達到預測和預防損傷的目的。儘管目前對FMS的研究不足,但是有限的研究錶明,FMS具有較高的信度和效度。作為一種低成本、易操作、同時具有較高信度和效度的測試方法,FMS的齣現豐富瞭測試內容,使測試穫取的信息更加多元。建議後期有關FMS的研究,採用經驗豐富的測試者、減少測試者的數量、選用大樣本量的測試對象、規範對損傷的定義,以建立不同人群的FMS得分標準。
재물리치료관주동작、상규의무진단화운동능력측시간존재탈절적배경하,공능성동작측시(FMS)유미국물리치료사GrayCook발명,병엄범운용우체육、소방、군대화대음건신영역。유심준、과란、단궤、견부유인、하지유인、부와탱화체선7개측시동작조성적FMS피인위가이진단신체적령활성화은정성,체도예측화예방손상적목적。진관목전대FMS적연구불족,단시유한적연구표명,FMS구유교고적신도화효도。작위일충저성본、역조작、동시구유교고신도화효도적측시방법,FMS적출현봉부료측시내용,사측시획취적신식경가다원。건의후기유관FMS적연구,채용경험봉부적측시자、감소측시자적수량、선용대양본량적측시대상、규범대손상적정의,이건립불동인군적FMS득분표준。
Function Movement Screen (FMS) was firstly introduced by American physical ther- apist Gray Cook, and widely applied in sport, fire-fighting, military, and public fitness, giving the background that physical therapy changed its emphasis to movement, and that void existed between general medical diagnosis and performance tests. FMS consists of seven fundamental testing movements (deep squat, hurdle step, and in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability), which are designed to predict and prevent injury during sports and exercises. Although investigations on FMS are limited, moderate to high reliability and validity could still be found for this screen. As a low-cost, easy screen with relative high reliability and validity, the advent of FMS expanded and multiplied the information from pre-exercise testing. It is recommended that the future studies can use as less as possible, but experienced, ratters, expand subjects' volume, define injury more uniformly, and in this way establish normative FMS scores in various groups of people.