CAJ | 학술논문

运用文献资料调研、专家访谈、逻辑分析和对比研究等方法，在对国际标准化组织（IS（））、欧洲标准化委员会（CEN）、德国标准化学会（DIN）与我国国家标准化管理委员会（SAC）的运行机制和体育标准化组织建设情况介绍的基础上，对体育标准化技术组织的地位与作用、体育标准化技术组织建设、参与国际体育标准化活动的程度、体育标准化重点领域等方面进行了比较。研究发现，我国体育标准化工作存在标准化技术组织的作用没有完全发挥，体育标准化技术组织体系建设不完善，参与国际标准化活动的程度较低，体育标准化重点领域不明确具体等问题。提出我国应提升体育标准化技术组织在体育标准化工作运行中的地位并充分发挥其作用，与国际相关标准化组织相对应，与我国体育发展需求相适应，发挥专家的主导作用和政府的协调作用，积极参与国际和区域体育标准化活动，细分体育标准化重点领域和提高其专门化水平等战略思路和对策建议。
운용문헌자료조연、전가방담、라집분석화대비연구등방법，재대국제표준화조직（IS（））、구주표준화위원회（CEN）、덕국표준화학회（DIN）여아국국가표준화관리위원회（SAC）적운행궤제화체육표준화조직건설정황개소적기출상，대체육표준화기술조직적지위여작용、체육표준화기술조직건설、삼여국제체육표준화활동적정도、체육표준화중점영역등방면진행료비교。연구발현，아국체육표준화공작존재표준화기술조직적작용몰유완전발휘，체육표준화기술조직체계건설불완선，삼여국제표준화활동적정도교저，체육표준화중점영역불명학구체등문제。제출아국응제승체육표준화기술조직재체육표준화공작운행중적지위병충분발휘기작용，여국제상관표준화조직상대응，여아국체육발전수구상괄응，발휘전가적주도작용화정부적협조작용，적겁삼여국제화구역체육표준화활동，세분체육표준화중점영역화제고기전문화수평등전략사로화대책건의。
In this paper, SAC is compared with ISO, CEN and DIN from the status, role and system construction of sports standard technical organization, activity level of participation in international sports standardization, and key field of sports standardization by using the meth- ods of literature review, logical analysis and comparative study. We conclude that there exist the following problems：the sports standard technical organization of China does not fully play the role, the construction of sports standard technical organization is not perfect, and the activi- ty level of participation in international sports standardization is not high, and the key fields of sports standardization are ambiguous. Several suggestions are proposed to solve these prob- lems=sports standard technical organization should play vitally important role in sports stand ardization of our country. The construction of sports standard technical organization should be corresponding to ISO and standard body of developed countries and appropriate to demand of Chinese sports development. The experts and government should fully play the leading and co ordinating roles in developing standard, respectively. The sports technical committees should actively participate in international and regional standardization activities. In addition, the key fields of sports standardization should be further subdivided and improved the specialization.