CAJ | 학술논문

惩罚性赔偿制度能够激励垄断行为受害者提起私人诉讼，也能够对垄断者形成强大威慑力。该制度在理论基础、功能、国外立法实践等方面具有证成的合理性。综合考察我国双倍赔偿制度立法先例、《消费者权益保护法》修改草案三倍赔偿制度之规定及反垄断司法实践，惩罚性赔偿制度引进立法的现实条件已经具备。基于垄断行为对社会整体利益的损害，三倍损害赔偿制度应当在我国《反垄断法》中予以规定。
징벌성배상제도능구격려롱단행위수해자제기사인소송，야능구대롱단자형성강대위섭력。해제도재이론기출、공능、국외입법실천등방면구유증성적합이성。종합고찰아국쌍배배상제도입법선례、《소비자권익보호법》수개초안삼배배상제도지규정급반롱단사법실천，징벌성배상제도인진입법적현실조건이경구비。기우롱단행위대사회정체이익적손해，삼배손해배상제도응당재아국《반롱단법》중여이규정。
The punitive damages institution of anti - monopoly law can not only encourage the damaged party to lodge a private complaint, but also can exert deterrence to the monopolists. There is justified rationality of this institution from the perspective of function, theoretical basis, foreign legislative practice and so on. Considering the double damages legislative precedent and the treble damages laid in the amendment draft of Consumer Protection Law and the anti - monopoly judicial prattle in our country, there is the practical foundation of the punitive damages to be laid in legislation. Based on the danaage of monopoly behavior to the overall interests of society, the treble damages institution should be provided in China＇ s anti - monopoly law.