CAJ | 학술논문

使用2005年1％人口抽样调查数据以及2011年流动人口动态监测调查数据，本文发现农民工教育回报率存在明显的地区差异：东部地区和发达城市的教育回报率明显高于中西部地区。比较两个年份的结果可以看出，农民工的总体教育回报率有所降低，地区间回报率的差异也有所降低，并呈现出向均值收敛的特征。控制福利状况和迁移时间以及修正样本选择偏差对文章分析的结论影响不大。教育回报率的地区差异对不同教育水平劳动力的相对迁移概率产生了显著的影响。进一步减少流动障碍，促进农民工合理流动将有助于提升我国的经济增长潜力。
사용2005년1％인구추양조사수거이급2011년류동인구동태감측조사수거，본문발현농민공교육회보솔존재명현적지구차이：동부지구화발체성시적교육회보솔명현고우중서부지구。비교량개년빈적결과가이간출，농민공적총체교육회보솔유소강저，지구간회보솔적차이야유소강저，병정현출향균치수렴적특정。공제복리상황화천이시간이급수정양본선택편차대문장분석적결론영향불대。교육회보솔적지구차이대불동교육수평노동력적상대천이개솔산생료현저적영향。진일보감소류동장애，촉진농민공합리류동장유조우제승아국적경제증장잠력。
Using two large survey data in 2005 and 2011, this paper finds a significant regional difference in the return to education for rural-to-urban migrants： the east and the rich cities have higher returns than the central and west regions. Between 2005 and 2011 , the overall return to education of migrant workers declined, and the regional difference shows the characteristics of convergence to the mean. These results are robust when we control for the welfare condition and migration time, and after we correct for the sample selection bias. We also find that migration flows were responsive to the regional difference in the returns to education. Further reducing movement barriers will help sustain China＇s economic growth.