教育与经济
教育與經濟
교육여경제
Education & Economy
2013年
3期
56~64
,共null页
高职学生 技能人力资本 生成路径 影响因素
高職學生 技能人力資本 生成路徑 影響因素
고직학생 기능인력자본 생성로경 영향인소
vocational college students; skillful human capital; generation path; influencing factors
本研究在对2453名学生和123位教师调查的基础上,对高职学生技能人力资本生成路径进行了实证分析。在研究假设的基础上,构建了高职学生技能人力资本生成的多维路径模型和单结构影响因素模型。通过多维路径模型分析发现,学生的实习实践性学习、家庭背景、个体差异等对学生的学习需求和已生成的技能评估产生影响。学习需求作为中介变量,对学生的技能评估产生中介效应。通过单结构影响因素模型分析发现,课程设置、教学方法、培养模式等对学生的学习兴趣和综合满意度产生显著性影响。采用多项选择和位子赋值排序方法综合分析发现,学生和教师对学生技能构成要素的“重要程度”、“掌握程度”、“需要程度”的认知有明显的差异。学生重视专业技能人力资本生成;教师则认为学生一般技能人力资本的提高比专业技能的提高更加重要。
本研究在對2453名學生和123位教師調查的基礎上,對高職學生技能人力資本生成路徑進行瞭實證分析。在研究假設的基礎上,構建瞭高職學生技能人力資本生成的多維路徑模型和單結構影響因素模型。通過多維路徑模型分析髮現,學生的實習實踐性學習、傢庭揹景、箇體差異等對學生的學習需求和已生成的技能評估產生影響。學習需求作為中介變量,對學生的技能評估產生中介效應。通過單結構影響因素模型分析髮現,課程設置、教學方法、培養模式等對學生的學習興趣和綜閤滿意度產生顯著性影響。採用多項選擇和位子賦值排序方法綜閤分析髮現,學生和教師對學生技能構成要素的“重要程度”、“掌握程度”、“需要程度”的認知有明顯的差異。學生重視專業技能人力資本生成;教師則認為學生一般技能人力資本的提高比專業技能的提高更加重要。
본연구재대2453명학생화123위교사조사적기출상,대고직학생기능인력자본생성로경진행료실증분석。재연구가설적기출상,구건료고직학생기능인력자본생성적다유로경모형화단결구영향인소모형。통과다유로경모형분석발현,학생적실습실천성학습、가정배경、개체차이등대학생적학습수구화이생성적기능평고산생영향。학습수구작위중개변량,대학생적기능평고산생중개효응。통과단결구영향인소모형분석발현,과정설치、교학방법、배양모식등대학생적학습흥취화종합만의도산생현저성영향。채용다항선택화위자부치배서방법종합분석발현,학생화교사대학생기능구성요소적“중요정도”、“장악정도”、“수요정도”적인지유명현적차이。학생중시전업기능인력자본생성;교사칙인위학생일반기능인력자본적제고비전업기능적제고경가중요。
This study, based on respond of 2453 students and 123 teachers to questionnaire-inquire, offers an empirical analysis of generation path for skillful human capital of vocational students .It builds models of both the multi-dimensional generation path and of the single factor on the assumption of research. It is revealed that such factors as the interns hands-on learning, family background, individual differences of students influence their learning needs and their assessment on their generated skills in the multidimensional path model, where being a mediators, learning needs has a intermediating effect on skills assessment of the students. While in single factor model, it is found that the curriculum, teaching methods, training mode, has an appreciable effect on the students' learning interest and their sense of satisfaction. The analysis found out that cognition between the students and teachers differs greatly on such skills- constituent elements as "the degree of importance, degree of command, and a degree of need" using multiple-choice and sorting methods. Students give importance to professional skills of human capital; on the contrary, teachers believe that it is more important to enhance the general skills of human capital of the students than to enhance their orofessional skills.