CAJ | 학술논문

为了归纳记忆的知觉干扰效应机制，实验采用“学习一测验”范式，探索了在不同程度视觉干扰条件下，再认测验里低频汉字及双字词的记忆成绩。结果发现：（1）在对低频汉字的记忆中，知觉干扰条件引起了“反知觉干扰效应”，即知觉干扰条件削弱了对汉字的记忆；（2）知觉于扰对低频双字词记忆无影响。这些结果结合以往的研究，可以解释为，不同的知觉干扰性质与不同的记忆材料的加工、编码性质有关，英文记忆的知觉干扰效应反映语音加工优势。
위료귀납기억적지각간우효응궤제，실험채용“학습일측험”범식，탐색료재불동정도시각간우조건하，재인측험리저빈한자급쌍자사적기억성적。결과발현：（1）재대저빈한자적기억중，지각간우조건인기료“반지각간우효응”，즉지각간우조건삭약료대한자적기억；（2）지각우우대저빈쌍자사기억무영향。저사결과결합이왕적연구，가이해석위，불동적지각간우성질여불동적기억재료적가공、편마성질유관，영문기억적지각간우효응반영어음가공우세。
The perceptual interference effect of memory refers to the phenomenon that masked presentations of English words during encoding counter-intuitively results in improved later memory. However, this effect is basically found with English words of high frequency. Further, controversies remain unsolved regarding how this effect is explained. More recently, a reverse effect has been found with Chinese characters of high frequency： characters that are followed by a mask are difficult to recognize in later test. This counter-effect of perceptual interference provides evidence against current theories of the interference effect. This counter effect has been suggested to reflect the reliance of Chinese characters on orthographic processing for semantic （deeper） processing during encoding, compared with English words and Chinese characters. Using a “study-test” paradigm, two experiments were run to examine this later suggestion with Chinese characters and double character compound words of low frequency. 384 Chinese characters （Experiment 1） and 384 compound words （Experiment 2） were presented to 55 native speakers of Mandarin（29 in experiment1, 26 in experiment 2） as participants in one of following 3 interference conditions in study phase. Specifically, a 500 ms prompt “＋” was first presented, and then a character （or compound word） was either presented continuously for 2500 ms, or briefly （for 110 ms or 260 ms） and then followed by a mask of random stokes for the remaining time. The participants were then required to read the stimulus presented on the screen aloud. All the characters and compound words in the study portions were presented randomly. After a distractor task, the participants were given a yes-no recognition test. Two experiments were both run on DELL computer using E-prime software. As a result, the accuracy rate of character-recognition test was significantly higher and the RT was shorter in the no-mask condition than in other mask, especially stronger mask conditions （Exp. 1）, whereas, no differences in both accuracy rate and RT of word-recognition test between any two conditions are significant （Exp. 2）. In conclusion, counter interference effects occur for Chinese characters regardless of frequency, but not for Chinese compound words. It is again suggested that deeper processing for memory in Chinese characters more relies on orthographic processing than on phonological processing.