CAJ | 학술논문

人们曾在不同层面上讨论心理学的危机，而这种对危机认识的偏离本身又进一步加强了学科本身的分裂。在总结前人对危机认识的基础上，通过分析表明，心理学危机是心理学学科发展中自我同一性危机的表现，其实质在于心理学学科同一性的缺乏，而根源来自于心理学建立之初的理论基础。因此，心理学危机的解决有待于其学科同一性的确立，心理学学科的发展则有待于其学科同一性的展开。
인문증재불동층면상토론심이학적위궤，이저충대위궤인식적편리본신우진일보가강료학과본신적분렬。재총결전인대위궤인식적기출상，통과분석표명，심이학위궤시심이학학과발전중자아동일성위궤적표현，기실질재우심이학학과동일성적결핍，이근원래자우심이학건립지초적이론기출。인차，심이학위궤적해결유대우기학과동일성적학립，심이학학과적발전칙유대우기학과동일성적전개。
Psychology is a confusing subject： First of all, if the subjects＇split is taken as a crisis, then there is no doubt that psychology was in crisis at birth. The crisis has actually accompanied psychology for more than 100 years of its history. The crisis of psychology split has not been eliminated to this day, and is getting more serious. The separation of psychology seriously hampers the development of this discipline. The crisis of psychology is discussed at different levels. However, most people believe that this crisis is rooted in the lack of a uniiied methodological basis, which has resulted in disciplinary split. They did not recognize the underlying causes of the lack ~~t a unified methodology. Therefore, the current understanding about the psychology crisis is inadequate. And this lack of adequate un- derstanding of the crisis is not only helpless in resolving the problem, but also further strengthens the disciplineg split. By drawing on the histo~of natural sciences, investigating the relationship between psychology with other disciplines （ including what motivated psy- chology into existence）, and reviewing the previous understandingsof the crisis in psychology, we conclude that the crisis is psychology g self - identity crisis in its development process. Sell＇ - identity crisis is due to a lack of discipline identity in psychology, which is root- edin psychology~ theoretical basis. In particular, tt~e development of any subjects firstly is based on its solid ontological foundation, and established on the basis of epistemological and methodological theory according to its body features. Then the applicable technology can be developed. However, psychologyg development did not follow this nile： before its ontology is established, the methodology has been tormed and taken the place of ontology to become the standard to examine whether the disciplines develop well or not. This abnormal concept of development constitutes unreasonable theoretical basis of psychology. And in later development of psychology, this mode has seriously misled the development of this discipline. Further analysis shows that the psychologyg separation resulted from the lack of its unified ontology - object concept. Researchers did not widely recognize the particularity of human nature, which was regarded as a re- search object unique in thepsychologicaldiscipline. Theretore, the methodology consistent with its objects concept did not get estab- lished, which led to the division of the discipline. Psychology, as a science to explore human nature, did not reach consensus on itsview of human nature by the researchers. Therefore, without a view of human nature that most of researchers accepted, a methodological ba- sis different from other disciplines cannot be established on this basis. Therefore, psychologyhas not been able to develop itself in accord- ance with the laws of its own. Finally, psychology puts itself into a self - identity crisis. Without a unified object concept and methodol- ogy, psychology inevitably falls apart. Theretore, the solution to the crisis of psychology depends on the establishment of its disciplinary identity. In other words, a unified methodology is to be established on the basis of a unified view of human nature, and then psychology can develop in its own way as a science of human nature.