中国农业大学学报:社会科学版
中國農業大學學報:社會科學版
중국농업대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of China Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
2013年
4期
117~126
,共null页
房产税 税收调控政策 政策效应 保有环节 流转环节
房產稅 稅收調控政策 政策效應 保有環節 流轉環節
방산세 세수조공정책 정책효응 보유배절 류전배절
Property tax; Tax regulation policy; Policy effects; Tenure; Transferring
.文章对我国在个人房产保有环节与流转环节的税收调控政策(分别主要为房产税与房产转让个人所得税)的政策效应(包括房价调控效应、地方政府财政收入调节效应两方面)、法律依据及实际税收征管中的操作难点与障碍进行了比较分析,并对下一步我国以税收政策调控国内房地产市场的政策空间进行了合理预测.研究认为,只有在收入水平不变和住房需求结构不变的一般假设条件下,房产税与房产转让个人所得税才可能具有抑制房地产泡沫的作用,而事实上由于我国居民收入水平与住房刚性需求的上升,房产税与房产转让个人所得税并不能改变房产价格的上升趋势;另外,在我国现行的房产税税基下,其税收收入难以对地方政府的新增税收收入产生重大贡献,在规范合并当前的土地出让金政策之前,在地方政府层面缺乏推广房产税的动力与积极性.
.文章對我國在箇人房產保有環節與流轉環節的稅收調控政策(分彆主要為房產稅與房產轉讓箇人所得稅)的政策效應(包括房價調控效應、地方政府財政收入調節效應兩方麵)、法律依據及實際稅收徵管中的操作難點與障礙進行瞭比較分析,併對下一步我國以稅收政策調控國內房地產市場的政策空間進行瞭閤理預測.研究認為,隻有在收入水平不變和住房需求結構不變的一般假設條件下,房產稅與房產轉讓箇人所得稅纔可能具有抑製房地產泡沫的作用,而事實上由于我國居民收入水平與住房剛性需求的上升,房產稅與房產轉讓箇人所得稅併不能改變房產價格的上升趨勢;另外,在我國現行的房產稅稅基下,其稅收收入難以對地方政府的新增稅收收入產生重大貢獻,在規範閤併噹前的土地齣讓金政策之前,在地方政府層麵缺乏推廣房產稅的動力與積極性.
.문장대아국재개인방산보유배절여류전배절적세수조공정책(분별주요위방산세여방산전양개인소득세)적정책효응(포괄방개조공효응、지방정부재정수입조절효응량방면)、법률의거급실제세수정관중적조작난점여장애진행료비교분석,병대하일보아국이세수정책조공국내방지산시장적정책공간진행료합리예측.연구인위,지유재수입수평불변화주방수구결구불변적일반가설조건하,방산세여방산전양개인소득세재가능구유억제방지산포말적작용,이사실상유우아국거민수입수평여주방강성수구적상승,방산세여방산전양개인소득세병불능개변방산개격적상승추세;령외,재아국현행적방산세세기하,기세수수입난이대지방정부적신증세수수입산생중대공헌,재규범합병당전적토지출양금정책지전,재지방정부층면결핍추엄방산세적동력여적겁성.
Through the comparison of policy effects, legal basis, tax revenue collection management between property tax and individual income tax of property transferring, which are the main tax regulation instruments at individual property ten- ure and transferring respectively, the author concludes that only under the assumption that people' s income level and the demand structure of real estate keeping the same, can property tax and individual income tax of property transferring curb the real estate bubble and prevent the real estate price from growing up too fast. Actually, because of the rapid income increment, people's absolute demand for real estate grows up quickly, which leads to the rapidly increasing tendency of real estate price in China, so property tax and individual income tax of property transferring can do little to change the increasing tendency. In addition, under" China' s current property tax structure, property tax revenue can't contribute significantly to local government receipts, so they won' t have enough incentive to implement property tax policy until Land Premium is taken into accouut in property tax and won't be levied respectively any longer.