CAJ | 학술논문

项目的复杂性管理已成为项目管理中的重要组成部分,对大型复杂项目的成功至关重要.本文基于以隐性工作表示的项目复杂性测度理念对项目复杂性进行了界定,然后借助于仿真软件ProjectSim分析了项目复杂性分别为0.50,0.75,1.00,1.25时不同组织配置对项目复杂性和项目进度、人力成本以及过程质量、产品质量、项目、职能、交流、会议、协调等7类风险指标的影响作用,从而探索出不同优先条件下复杂项目的综合优化路径.该研究对多目标下复杂项目的综合优化具有较强的指导意义和借鉴意义.
항목적복잡성관리이성위항목관리중적중요조성부분,대대형복잡항목적성공지관중요.본문기우이은성공작표시적항목복잡성측도이념대항목복잡성진행료계정,연후차조우방진연건ProjectSim분석료항목복잡성분별위0.50,0.75,1.00,1.25시불동조직배치대항목복잡성화항목진도、인력성본이급과정질량、산품질량、항목、직능、교류、회의、협조등7류풍험지표적영향작용,종이탐색출불동우선조건하복잡항목적종합우화로경.해연구대다목표하복잡항목적종합우화구유교강적지도의의화차감의의.
Project complexity management has become an important part of project management, which is crucial to the success of large complex projects. However, traditional project management theory mostly focuses on achieving the optimal choice under the constraints of progress and cost. Very few studies investigate the change of the whole project complexity and various performance indicators after program optimization is achieved. Therefore, it is necessary to study different performance indicators after a complex project has achieved optimization. Based on the World Expo＇s AB area project, the paper configures different project complexity conditions with 0. 50, 0. 75, 1.00, and 1.25 using the project organization and process simulation software ProjectSim. Data analysis results enable us to discuss the optimization function of different factors related to project complexity and performance indicators with different degrees of project complexity. This study shows that when project complexity is 0. 5 the preferred way is to improve organization standardization, and the way of improving organization matrix form, the working experience and team experience can be chosen in turn if the primary purpose is to decrease project complexity. However, if the primary purpose is to shorten project period project members should emphasize on improving their work experience. We can first improve organization matrix form, followed by-standardization. We can improve organization standardization, team experience, organization matrix form, and working experience in sequence if project complexity is 0. 75 and the primary purpose is to decrease project complexity. Especially, improving organization standardization can greatly reduce project complexity. However, if the primary purpose is to shorten the project period we can choose to improve working experience, and organization standardization, team experience in sequence. In particular, working experience improvement can shorten the project period greatly. When project complexity is 1.00, the best way to optimize the whole project is to enhance the work experience of organization members, and improving the organization standardization is one of the important comprehensive optimization measures of the project. When the project complexity is increased tol. 25, it is easy to cause project failure because various project risks will increase greatly due to the mismatch of organizations. Based on the findings, this paper is able to explore the integrated optimization path under different priority conditions including project complexity, project progress, human cost, and all kinds of risks and so on. This paper provides insights into managing large complex projects from both academic and practical perspectives.