CAJ | 학술논문

我国非法证据排除规则在审判实践中极少运用，基本处于休眠状态，其中一个重要原因是非法证据排除的审理程序设计不尽完善。新修订的《刑事诉讼法》虽然明确了有关非法证据排除的审理程序，但仍未有明显改观。本文通过抽取某中级人民法院审理的百件刑事案件为样本，辅之以对法官的问卷调查，以实证研究的进路检视法律设计困境，提出从确立衡平裁判观、补强非法证据排除庭前程序、细化法庭调查程序、明确救济方式、规范法官自由裁量权等方面完善该规则的审判适用程序。
아국비법증거배제규칙재심판실천중겁소운용，기본처우휴면상태，기중일개중요원인시비법증거배제적심리정서설계불진완선。신수정적《형사소송법》수연명학료유관비법증거배제적심리정서，단잉미유명현개관。본문통과추취모중급인민법원심리적백건형사안건위양본，보지이대법관적문권조사，이실증연구적진로검시법률설계곤경，제출종학립형평재판관、보강비법증거배제정전정서、세화법정조사정서、명학구제방식、규범법관자유재량권등방면완선해규칙적심판괄용정서。
The exclusionary rule includes the rule that illegally seized evidence must be excluded and the trial proce- dure of exclusion of illegally seized evidence. The aim of the procedure is to protect the implementation of the exclusionary rule. One of the main reasons that the exclusionary rule cannot function well in practice is caused by some faults of the trial procedure. In order to improve the trial procedure, some measures should be considered involving in establishment of the i- dea of keeping balance between protection of human rights and punishment of crimes, such as strengthening pretrial proce- dure of the exclusionary rule; specifying court investigational procedure of the exclusionary rule, defining relief methods of judgment that exclude illegally seized evidence, protecting the petition rights of concerning parties both from prosecutors and defendants, and confining the judges＇discretion while making a judgment of exclusion of illegally seized evidence.