CAJ | 학술논문

群体性事件是当下我国典型的集群行为。本研究通过问卷调查和实验室情境设计的方法，考察了民众面临的群际威胁通过群体效能和群体愤怒的中介作用影响集群行为意向的双路径模型，及群体认同对该双路径模型的调节效应。结果表明：1）群体效能和群体愤怒均是群际威胁（现实威胁和认同威胁）影响集群行为意向的中介变量。且现实威胁通过群体效能影响集群行为意向的中介作用强于其通过群体愤怒影响集群行为意向的中介作用；认同威胁通过群体愤怒影响集群行为意向的中介作用强于其通过群体效能影响集群行为意向的中介作用。21群体认同是群际威胁影响集群行为意向的调节变量，群体认同的调节效应通过群体效能和群体愤怒的中介作用实现。本研究扩展了集群行为的双路径模型，并为政府预防和化解群体性事件提供思路。
군체성사건시당하아국전형적집군행위。본연구통과문권조사화실험실정경설계적방법，고찰료민음면림적군제위협통과군체효능화군체분노적중개작용영향집군행위의향적쌍로경모형，급군체인동대해쌍로경모형적조절효응。결과표명：1）군체효능화군체분노균시군제위협（현실위협화인동위협）영향집군행위의향적중개변량。차현실위협통과군체효능영향집군행위의향적중개작용강우기통과군체분노영향집군행위의향적중개작용；인동위협통과군체분노영향집군행위의향적중개작용강우기통과군체효능영향집군행위의향적중개작용。21군체인동시군제위협영향집군행위의향적조절변량，군체인동적조절효응통과군체효능화군체분노적중개작용실현。본연구확전료집군행위적쌍로경모형，병위정부예방화화해군체성사건제공사로。
As the representation of social contradictions, collective action in China typically involves mass incidents, which refer to the conflicts between certain civilians and local administration. A group member engages in collective action any time that he or she acts as a representative of a group and when the action is directed at improving the conditions for the entire group. This research focused on the motivation mechanism underlying collective action in different intergroup threat （i.e., realistic threat and identity threat） by using a survey （study 1） and an experiment （study 2）. The main purpose of study 1 was to investigate the mediated effects of group efficacy （one pathway） and group-based anger （another pathway） on the relation between intergroup treat and collective action intention. Moreover, study 2 explored the moderated effect of group identity in the dual-pathway model. The results indicated that： First, both group efficacy and group-based anger were mediators of the relation between intergroup threat （realistic threat and identity threat） and collective action intention. Specifically, group efficacy mediated the relation between realistic threat and collective action intention; group efficacy also mediated the relation between identity threat and collective action intention; group-based anger mediated the relation between realistic threat and collective action intention; group-based anger also mediated the relation between identity threat and collective action intention. Moreover, the mediating effect of group efficacy on realistic threat-collective action intention relation was stronger than that on identity threat-collective action intention association; whereas the mediating effect of group-based anger on identity threat-collective action intention relation was stronger than that on realistic threat-collective action intention association. Second, group identity moderated the relation between intergroup threat and collective action intention. Specifically, group identity moderated the relation between realistic threat and collective action intention; whereas group identity moderated the relation between identity threat and collective action intention. In addition, group identity was a mediated moderator that group efficacy and group-based anger mediated the relation between the group identity- intergroup threat interaction and collective action intention. An important theoretical implication of this research is that it connects the dual-pathway model of collective action with the different types of intergroup threat at distinct levels of group identity. Furthermore, the current study provides a useful analytical paradigm for mediated moderating effects. Regarding the practical implications, this research examines the social psychological motivation mechanism underlying collective action in China to inform administrators and policy makers on how to monitor and reduce mass incidents in public administration.