CAJ | 학술논문

鉴定人出庭率极低一直是困扰鉴定意见审查的障碍，2012年新民事诉讼法强化了其出庭义务，具有重要意义。但仍然存在诸多遗憾，如程序启动不合理、鉴定人权利保障不充分，出庭内容不明确，配套机制不健全，救济机制缺乏等。其完善必须尊重当事人程序选择权，赋予鉴定人报酬请求权和安全保障权。同时，通过制定详细的鉴定人出庭庭审细则和鉴定意见采信标准，明确出庭程序内容，完善专家辅助人制度、双向视听传输技术作证制度等配套机制。，最后，在鉴定人不出庭导致鉴定意见不被采信时，应准许当事人申请重新鉴定。
감정인출정솔겁저일직시곤우감정의견심사적장애，2012년신민사소송법강화료기출정의무，구유중요의의。단잉연존재제다유감，여정서계동불합리、감정인권리보장불충분，출정내용불명학，배투궤제불건전，구제궤제결핍등。기완선필수존중당사인정서선택권，부여감정인보수청구권화안전보장권。동시，통과제정상세적감정인출정정심세칙화감정의견채신표준，명학출정정서내용，완선전가보조인제도、쌍향시은전수기술작증제도등배투궤제。，최후，재감정인불출정도치감정의견불피채신시，응준허당사인신청중신감정。
The appraiser rarely appearance in court which always puzzles how to examine appraisal opinion in＇civil procedure. In 2012, it is very meaningful that the new civil procedural law has provided relevant situation and legal consequence to strengthen appraiser appearance in Court. But there is still a pity, such as procedural starting is unreasonable, the protection of appraiser＇s right is insufficiency , the contents of appearance in court is unclear , the support mechanism is inadequate, the remedy mechanism is lacking and so on. To perfect this system, we should strengthen litigant ＂s relevant procedure-choosing right, endow them reward-requiring right and security-requiring right. At the same time,we should define the contents of appearance in court, perfect expert auxiliary system and testification system of two-way audio-visual transmission technology and so on by detailing the regulation wich appraiser appearance in court and the appraisal opinion admission standard. At last, if appraisal opinion cant be accepted as the basis of verdict due to appraiser＇s absence in court,, we should allow litigant to apply for another identification.