CAJ | 학술논문

西方舆论一直存在着马克思主义是否是经济决定论的争论，这直接影响着人们对马克思主义理论，尤其是对历史唯物主义的正确认识。本文从分析特里·伊格尔顿对马克思主义评价的“历史单调轮回”和“经济的幽灵”的论据出发，探究了马克思主义和经济决定论在古典经济学上的分歧，历述了恩格斯、葛兰西、卢卡奇等人对经济决定论的批判，揭示了“经济”在马克思主义学说中的本来面目，特别是提出要对历史唯物主义理论下的经济和剩余价值学说下的经济进行二分理解，从而厘清马克思主义关于社会发展和历史进程的决定因素，摆脱经济决定论的桎梏和消极影响。
서방여론일직존재착마극사주의시부시경제결정론적쟁론，저직접영향착인문대마극사주의이론，우기시대역사유물주의적정학인식。본문종분석특리·이격이돈대마극사주의평개적“역사단조륜회”화“경제적유령”적론거출발，탐구료마극사주의화경제결정론재고전경제학상적분기，력술료은격사、갈란서、로잡기등인대경제결정론적비판，게시료“경제”재마극사주의학설중적본래면목，특별시제출요대역사유물주의이론하적경제화잉여개치학설하적경제진행이분리해，종이전청마극사주의관우사회발전화역사진정적결정인소，파탈경제결정론적질곡화소겁영향。
There has been an academic debate about whether Marxism is economic determinism in western public voice or not, which directly affects people＇s understanding of theory of Marxism, especially historical materialism. This paper sets sail from historical monotonous cycle and economic ghost that belong to evaluation of Terry Eagleton to Marx. It explores the differences of views on classical economics between Marxism and economic determinism, and then it analyses some criticisms of economic determinism from Engels, Gramsci and Lukacs, so as to explore the true Marxist attitude to economy. It is very important to distinguish the different economic meanings between historical materialism and surplus value doctrine, thus it can be clear about determination of social development and historical course from the angle of Marxism, while getting rid of its negative influence.