CAJ | 학술논문

罗中枢教授关于康德的“纯粹自然科学”并非指通常意义上的自然科学，而是指纯粹哲学或一般自然的形而上学的观点非常独到，但也使人产生了两个疑问：首先，如果“纯粹自然科学”就是一般自然的形而上学，那么，康德为什么在追问“纯粹自然科学是如何可能的？”时，还要把“形而上学作为一种自然倾向是如何可能的？”和“形而上学作为科学是如何可能的？”这两个问题单独提出来？其次，如果康德的“纯粹自然科学”就是一般自然的形而上学，它与一般自然科学或牛顿物理学有何关系？本文试图对罗教授的观点作一补释，从“纯粹理性的建筑术”的角度来理解康德的“纯粹自然科学”，并力图解答上述两个疑问。
라중추교수관우강덕적“순수자연과학”병비지통상의의상적자연과학，이시지순수철학혹일반자연적형이상학적관점비상독도，단야사인산생료량개의문：수선，여과“순수자연과학”취시일반자연적형이상학，나요，강덕위십요재추문“순수자연과학시여하가능적？”시，환요파“형이상학작위일충자연경향시여하가능적？”화“형이상학작위과학시여하가능적？”저량개문제단독제출래？기차，여과강덕적“순수자연과학”취시일반자연적형이상학，타여일반자연과학혹우돈물이학유하관계？본문시도대라교수적관점작일보석，종“순수이성적건축술”적각도래리해강덕적“순수자연과학”，병력도해답상술량개의문。
In one of Professor of LUO Zhongshu＇s papers, he pointed out that Kant＇s ＂pure natural science＂ is not the general science, but the pure philosophy or metaphysics of general nature. It is obvious that Professor LUO＇ view is original and instructive. But, Professor LUO＇s view has has given rise to two problems. First, if Kant＇s ＂pure natural science＂ is general natural metaphysics, why Kant asked ＂How pure natural science is possible？＂, and why he asked ＂How is it possible to take the metaphysics as a natural tendency？＂ and ＂How is it possible to take the general metaphysics as a science？＂. Second, if Kant＇s ＂pure natural science＂ is general natural metaphysics, what＇s the relations between ＂pure natural science＂ and general natural science or Newton＇s physics. The authors try to understand Kant＇s ＂pure natural science＂ from ＂The Archetectnic of Pure Reason＂, and tried to answer the two problems above, which attempts to develop Professor LUO＇s view about Kant＇s ＂pure natural science＂.