CAJ | 학술논문

范晓蕾（2011）以语义地图模型为理论工具构建基于汉语方言的能性情态语义地图，该地图与van der Auwera8LPlungian（1998）的主要差异是无语义关联“许可（参与者外在可能）-认识可能”。本文通过解释此差异来论证对van der Auwera＆Plungian（1998）的主要修正之处。此问题的讨论既涉及语义地图方法论的问题：“形式”及“功能”应如何细分，也涉及情态类型系统的界定：情态概念应如何划类。本研究显示出，语义地图模型在方法论上需进一步完善，语义地图研究对普通语义学有很大的关照。
범효뢰（2011）이어의지도모형위이론공구구건기우한어방언적능성정태어의지도，해지도여van der Auwera8LPlungian（1998）적주요차이시무어의관련“허가（삼여자외재가능）-인식가능”。본문통과해석차차이래론증대van der Auwera＆Plungian（1998）적주요수정지처。차문제적토론기섭급어의지도방법론적문제：“형식”급“공능”응여하세분，야섭급정태류형계통적계정：정태개념응여하화류。본연구현시출，어의지도모형재방법론상수진일보완선，어의지도연구대보통어의학유흔대적관조。
Fan Xiaolei （2011） has established ＇the semantic map of possibility modali- ty＇ based on comparative evidence from Chinese dialects with the theoretical tool Semantic Map Model. To some extent, Fan~s model is different from the modality＇s semantic map as proposed by van der Auweral et al. （1998）, in that the former has no counterpart se- mantic path with ＇external-participant possibility-epistemic possibility＇ as maintained by the latter. This paper aims at explaining the discrepancy and verifying our revision to van der Auwera et al. （1998）, which involves the methodology refinement of the Semantic Map Model, as well as a new scheme of modality classification. The discussion demon- strates that the Semantic Map Model needs further improvement while it assists the study of semantics.