CAJ | 학술논문

现实中，作品千差万别，《伯尔尼公约》将其分为两类：文学作品和艺术作品。20世纪80年代，美国等国将计算机软件作为文学作品，纳入版权法的保护范围。随后，在西方国家的鼓动下，《TRIPS协定》也要娜。成员将计算机软件作为《伯尔尼公约》中的文学作品加以保护。令人遗憾的是，我国学界未能将“文学作品”理解为一个法律概念，想当然地认为软件与“文学”无关，将literary works译成“文字作品”以期涵盖计算机软件。此后，在概念法学的驱使下，又推断出“口述作品”。受此误导，我国《著作权法》以双重标准——作品形式和作品内容一对作品进行分类，致使作品各种类之间矛盾、重叠。为了使我国著作权法中作品的分类更加科学，建议将Literary Works译为“文学作品”。
현실중，작품천차만별，《백이니공약》장기분위량류：문학작품화예술작품。20세기80년대，미국등국장계산궤연건작위문학작품，납입판권법적보호범위。수후，재서방국가적고동하，《TRIPS협정》야요나。성원장계산궤연건작위《백이니공약》중적문학작품가이보호。령인유감적시，아국학계미능장“문학작품”리해위일개법률개념，상당연지인위연건여“문학”무관，장literary works역성“문자작품”이기함개계산궤연건。차후，재개념법학적구사하，우추단출“구술작품”。수차오도，아국《저작권법》이쌍중표준——작품형식화작품내용일대작품진행분류，치사작품각충류지간모순、중첩。위료사아국저작권법중작품적분류경가과학，건의장Literary Works역위“문학작품”。
The Beme Convention classifies works into two categories： literary works and artistic works, although works differ in thouands of ways in reality. In1980s the United States and some other countries incorporated computer programs as literary works into their respective copyright law. During the Uruguay Round trade negotiation, the TRIPS agreement, insisted by the United States and the EU, requires that the members of the WTO protect computer programs as literary works under the Berne Convention. Disappointingly, academia in China did not understand the term ＂literary work＂ as a legal term, and took it for granted that a ＂literary work＂ had nothing to do with literature. Accordingly, they intentionally translated ＂literary work＂ as ＂written work＂ to include computer programs. Subsequently, driven by the mechanic jurisprudence, ＂oral works＂ was inferred from the translation. Misled by this, the Chinese Copyright Law classified works by applying two different criteria： the form and the content. As a result, the classified categories are overlapped and contravene with each other. No logic or rule can be discerned from the classification.