法学论坛
法學論罈
법학론단
Legal Forum
2014年
1期
131~136
,共null页
犯罪本质 义务违反说 法益侵害说
犯罪本質 義務違反說 法益侵害說
범죄본질 의무위반설 법익침해설
the nature of crime; The Breach of Duty Theory; view of infringement of legal interests
法益说存在着不足，而义务违反说能够克服法益说的不足。如在说明行政犯、身份犯、未遂犯、危险犯和预备犯、疏忽大意犯罪等处罚的合理性时，义务违反说较之法益说具有无比的优越性。义务违反是犯罪的本体属性，而法益侵害应作为对行为人义务违反的外在衡量标尺，即犯罪本质的间接的衡量指标，它与义务违反的关系，正如树木的高与测量高度的尺子——本体与喻体的关系一样，既不相同又相互关联。
法益說存在著不足，而義務違反說能夠剋服法益說的不足。如在說明行政犯、身份犯、未遂犯、危險犯和預備犯、疏忽大意犯罪等處罰的閤理性時，義務違反說較之法益說具有無比的優越性。義務違反是犯罪的本體屬性，而法益侵害應作為對行為人義務違反的外在衡量標呎，即犯罪本質的間接的衡量指標，它與義務違反的關繫，正如樹木的高與測量高度的呎子——本體與喻體的關繫一樣，既不相同又相互關聯。
법익설존재착불족，이의무위반설능구극복법익설적불족。여재설명행정범、신빈범、미수범、위험범화예비범、소홀대의범죄등처벌적합이성시，의무위반설교지법익설구유무비적우월성。의무위반시범죄적본체속성，이법익침해응작위대행위인의무위반적외재형량표척，즉범죄본질적간접적형량지표，타여의무위반적관계，정여수목적고여측량고도적척자——본체여유체적관계일양，기불상동우상호관련。
＂Breach of duty＂ theory can overcome the legal interest infringement theory. For example, in the description penalties administrative offense, identity commit, attempts to commit, Dangerous and certain preparatory acts, criminal negligence, and so on, rationality, the ＂breach of duty＂ has incomparable superiority. Breach of duty is a crime ontology attributes, legal interest is a measure of the harm criminal means. Infringement on the legal interest can indirectly measure the behavior of the obligation breached. It is the relationship with the breach of duty, like the height of trees and the ruler that measure the height the rela- tionship between the body and the metaphor.
