法学研究
法學研究
법학연구
Cass Journal of Law
2014年
1期
43~55
,共null页
裁量基准 公众参与 模式选择
裁量基準 公衆參與 模式選擇
재량기준 공음삼여 모식선택
discretion standard, public participation, mode choice
公众参与作为一种直接的民意表达方式,可以提供类似议会立法一样的民主形式和内容,因而成为补充裁量基准正当性基础的首选方案。但是,基于裁量基准行政自制属性和行政成本的考量,它仍然不宜作为一项强制性义务强加给行政机关,而应由行政机关自主决定。实践中,行政机关应当以裁量基准的“质量要求”和“可接受性要求”为基本参考因素,比对相对人与自己的预期目标是否一致,根据其特殊性及实际情形,在“改良的自主管理决策”、“分散式的公众协商”、“整体式的公众协商”、“公共决策或共同决定”四种程度不同的公众参与模式中选择适用。
公衆參與作為一種直接的民意錶達方式,可以提供類似議會立法一樣的民主形式和內容,因而成為補充裁量基準正噹性基礎的首選方案。但是,基于裁量基準行政自製屬性和行政成本的攷量,它仍然不宜作為一項彊製性義務彊加給行政機關,而應由行政機關自主決定。實踐中,行政機關應噹以裁量基準的“質量要求”和“可接受性要求”為基本參攷因素,比對相對人與自己的預期目標是否一緻,根據其特殊性及實際情形,在“改良的自主管理決策”、“分散式的公衆協商”、“整體式的公衆協商”、“公共決策或共同決定”四種程度不同的公衆參與模式中選擇適用。
공음삼여작위일충직접적민의표체방식,가이제공유사의회입법일양적민주형식화내용,인이성위보충재량기준정당성기출적수선방안。단시,기우재량기준행정자제속성화행정성본적고량,타잉연불의작위일항강제성의무강가급행정궤관,이응유행정궤관자주결정。실천중,행정궤관응당이재량기준적“질량요구”화“가접수성요구”위기본삼고인소,비대상대인여자기적예기목표시부일치,근거기특수성급실제정형,재“개량적자주관리결책”、“분산식적공음협상”、“정체식적공음협상”、“공공결책혹공동결정”사충정도불동적공음삼여모식중선택괄용。
As the application of legislative discretion power or a rule-making power, the legal effect of discretion standard is not from legislature, but administrative agency. In essence, discretion standard is a self-regulation rule which is made by administrative agency. In China, to enhance discretion standard' s democratic image as administrative rules, most of scholars believe that rule-makers should take advantage of the procedure of public participation to solicit public suggestions as much as possible. In the practice of discretion standard, this view has been recognized by the majority. However, there is no answer to the question why discretion standard should be controlled by public participation, which is a heteronomous system contrary to the autonomous nature of discretion standard, and no one refers to the answer about what extent to be used and the specific operating techniques of the public participation to the discretion standard. This is not only detrimental to the development of discretion standard, but also has produced many unrealistic requirements about discretion standard in the local laws and regulations. In my opinion, although public participation is probably the first choice because it is a direct public expression mechanism which can offer the form and content of democracy similar to the parliament, pttbhc participation should be treated as an alternative rather than mandatory obligation to administrative agency taking into account the discretion standard' s self-regulation nature and the administrative costs. In practice, administrative agency should take the quality requirement and acceptability requirement as two main factors, consider the goal of the administrative parties, and then make a choice among the four kinds of public participation mode by the reference to its particularity and the reality, that is, the mode of modified autonomous managerial decision, the mode of segmented public consultation, the mode of unitary public consultation, and the mode of public decision.