法律科学：西北政法学院学报
法律科學：西北政法學院學報
법률과학：서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2014年
1期
155~165
,共null页
知识产权纠纷 行政调解 司法确认
知識產權糾紛 行政調解 司法確認
지식산권규분 행정조해 사법학인
intellectual property dispute; administrative mediation; judicial recognition
中国知识产权纠纷行政调解是伴随着政府服务功能的发展，从行政裁决范畴中独立出来的一种服务性行政事实行为。然而，以《专利行政执法办法》为样本进行剖析的结果显示，知识产权领域的行政调解目前在性质上仍然被视为是一种行政执法行为，调解过程习惯性地被烙上了行政执法的色彩，其实施效果不尽如人意。中国知识产权纠纷行政调解应尽快实现从传统执法到现代服务理念的更新；通过制定专门的《知识产权行政调解办法》，从制度层面切实推进行政调解服务主体的多样化、服务对象的类型化、服务程序的精细化和服务损害的可救济化。在实践层面，应积极探索知识产权行政调解协议的司法确认，克服基层人民法院的管辖权障碍，实现行政调解和司法程序的有机衔接和良性互动。
中國知識產權糾紛行政調解是伴隨著政府服務功能的髮展，從行政裁決範疇中獨立齣來的一種服務性行政事實行為。然而，以《專利行政執法辦法》為樣本進行剖析的結果顯示，知識產權領域的行政調解目前在性質上仍然被視為是一種行政執法行為，調解過程習慣性地被烙上瞭行政執法的色綵，其實施效果不儘如人意。中國知識產權糾紛行政調解應儘快實現從傳統執法到現代服務理唸的更新；通過製定專門的《知識產權行政調解辦法》，從製度層麵切實推進行政調解服務主體的多樣化、服務對象的類型化、服務程序的精細化和服務損害的可救濟化。在實踐層麵，應積極探索知識產權行政調解協議的司法確認，剋服基層人民法院的管轄權障礙，實現行政調解和司法程序的有機銜接和良性互動。
중국지식산권규분행정조해시반수착정부복무공능적발전，종행정재결범주중독립출래적일충복무성행정사실행위。연이，이《전리행정집법판법》위양본진행부석적결과현시，지식산권영역적행정조해목전재성질상잉연피시위시일충행정집법행위，조해과정습관성지피락상료행정집법적색채，기실시효과불진여인의。중국지식산권규분행정조해응진쾌실현종전통집법도현대복무이념적경신；통과제정전문적《지식산권행정조해판법》，종제도층면절실추진행정조해복무주체적다양화、복무대상적류형화、복무정서적정세화화복무손해적가구제화。재실천층면，응적겁탐색지식산권행정조해협의적사법학인，극복기층인민법원적관할권장애，실현행정조해화사법정서적유궤함접화량성호동。
Accompanied by the development of government service function, the administrative mediation of intellectual property disputes, as a kind of service administrative fact behavior, gradually separates from the category of administrative adjudication. According to the results of ＂Measures for Patent Administrative Law Enforcement ＂ as a sample for analysis, however, the administrative mediation in the field of intellectual property is still regarded as an act of administrative law - enforcement in nature currently, thus leading to the mediation process habitually be branded with colors of the administra- tive law enforcement along with the unsatisfied implementation effect. The administrative mediation of intellectual property disputes in our country needs to update the concept from traditional law enforcement to modem service as soon as possible; and by making a specialized law from institutional dimension as ＂Measures for Administrative Mediation of Intellectual Property＂ to promote the diversification of administrative mediation service principal, the categorization of service object, the refinement of service procedure and the remedy of service damage. In practical level, our country should actively ex- plore how to implement the process from administrative mediation agreement of intellectual property to judicial confirmation and overcome the obstacles of the people＇s court jurisdiction at the grassroot level, so as to realize the organic connection and benign interaction between administrative mediation and judicial procedure.
