CAJ | 학술논문

在中国刑事程序中，步鉴上访现象频频发生，且相对集中于死亡原因、损伤程度等法医鉴定领域，它被当事人视为不满公安、司法机关鉴定意见时最常见的诉讼外救济措施和抗争策略。然而，步鉴上访，尤其是重复上访、越级上访、多头上访等形式，却颠覆了程序自治，使案件争议久施不决，司法权威一落千丈。步鉴上访存在的众多问题在实践中固然有一定合理性，但目前却亚须国家重点治理，其核心措施在于建立“过程导向信任”的鉴定机制，利用程序的开放性与主体的多方参与性，吸纳与化解当事人对鉴定过程与结果的不满;将当事人上访作为例外的“底限救济”权。
재중국형사정서중，보감상방현상빈빈발생，차상대집중우사망원인、손상정도등법의감정영역，타피당사인시위불만공안、사법궤관감정의견시최상견적소송외구제조시화항쟁책략。연이，보감상방，우기시중복상방、월급상방、다두상방등형식，각전복료정서자치，사안건쟁의구시불결，사법권위일락천장。보감상방존재적음다문제재실천중고연유일정합이성，단목전각아수국가중점치리，기핵심조시재우건립“과정도향신임”적감정궤제，이용정서적개방성여주체적다방삼여성，흡납여화해당사인대감정과정여결과적불만;장당사인상방작위예외적“저한구제”권。
In criminal proceedings, petitions on judicial identification often occur in China, relatively fo- cusing on cause of death, seriousness of injury and other matters in forensic fields. Such petitions are regarded as a non - litigation relief measure and resistance strategy when parties concerned dissatisfy with the appraisal opinions made by public security departments and judicial organs. However, some petitions such as repeated petitions, rank - jumping petitions, and multiple petitions have done substantial damages to procedural autono- my, leading to prolonged resolution of controversies and a disastrous decline of judicial authority. Though peti- tions on judicial identification are rational to some extent in practice, they require a nationwide key governance to resolve current problems. And the core measure is to establish an identification mechanism of ＂process ori- ented trust＂ and to rely on procedural openness and multiple parties＇ participation so as to dissolve the par- ties＇ dissatisfaction on appraisal process and results and to make the parties＇ petition as an exception with the fight to ＂bottom line relief＂.