CAJ | 학술논문

本文利用古文献资料和古地图资料，再结合笔者实地踏查的经验，考察了康熙五十一年穆克登定界时筑设的堆标的遗迹，确认黑石沟东南岸的土石堆沿长约23公里，舍54韩里，黑石沟全长约24公里，合57韩里。还确认黑石沟是一条干沟，没有水流入松花江，并不是松花江支流。本文阐明光绪年间勘界时所说的土石堆“沿长九十里”，不无参照康熙年间的许梁供辞而伪造的痕迹，目的是为了造成黑石沟与松花江上流相连的假象，因为这是土门、豆满二江说成立的前提。
본문이용고문헌자료화고지도자료，재결합필자실지답사적경험，고찰료강희오십일년목극등정계시축설적퇴표적유적，학인흑석구동남안적토석퇴연장약23공리，사54한리，흑석구전장약24공리，합57한리。환학인흑석구시일조간구，몰유수류입송화강，병불시송화강지류。본문천명광서년간감계시소설적토석퇴“연장구십리”，불무삼조강희년간적허량공사이위조적흔적，목적시위료조성흑석구여송화강상류상련적가상，인위저시토문、두만이강설성립적전제。
Making using of the historical documents and maps, plus the author＇s own field investigation, this article explores the remains of the piled rock markers built to demarcate Mukden in 1712. The evidence verifies the lengths of line of the mound and rock pile at the south bank of Black Rock Gully were 23 kilometers and the gully 24 kilometers. The article affirms that Black Rock Gully was dry, without water flowing into Songhua River. The gully was not a branch of Songhua River. The line of mound and rock pile extending 90 li （45 km） was articulated during a boundary-survey in the Guangxu reign that referred to the forged confession by Xuliang in the Kangxi Reign. This deception was meant to create a false appearance of the linkage of Black Rock Gully and the headwaters of Songhua River, because this was the pretext for the theory that the Tumen and Douman Rivers were the boundaries.