上海财经大学学报:哲学社会科学版
上海財經大學學報:哲學社會科學版
상해재경대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
2014年
1期
87~95
,共null页
“省直管县” 城市偏向 分配规则 外部环境
“省直管縣” 城市偏嚮 分配規則 外部環境
“성직관현” 성시편향 분배규칙 외부배경
county directly controlled by province-level government; urban bias; allocation
中国长期存在的“城乡二元分治”制度导致资源配置呈现明显的城市偏向特征,加剧了城乡不平等,也不利于社会和谐。基于财政转移支付的视角,文章研究发现,“省直管县”改革通过以下两个机制扭转了资源的城市偏向性配置:第一,“省直管县”改革提高了县乡经济发展激励,增加了县乡公共服务支出责任并提高了县级地区资金匹配能力,有利于县乡在既有分配规则下获取更多的财政转移支付。第二,“省直管县”改善了基层政府的财政地位,减少了上级政府的资金截留;同时使县辖区公共需求向上的传递渠道更加顺畅,从外部环境上为其获得更多的财政转移支付创造了条件。此外,多维度的检验也为深入了解财政转移支付分配规则的缺陷以及如何增进财政转移支付分配的公平性提供了经验证据。
中國長期存在的“城鄉二元分治”製度導緻資源配置呈現明顯的城市偏嚮特徵,加劇瞭城鄉不平等,也不利于社會和諧。基于財政轉移支付的視角,文章研究髮現,“省直管縣”改革通過以下兩箇機製扭轉瞭資源的城市偏嚮性配置:第一,“省直管縣”改革提高瞭縣鄉經濟髮展激勵,增加瞭縣鄉公共服務支齣責任併提高瞭縣級地區資金匹配能力,有利于縣鄉在既有分配規則下穫取更多的財政轉移支付。第二,“省直管縣”改善瞭基層政府的財政地位,減少瞭上級政府的資金截留;同時使縣轄區公共需求嚮上的傳遞渠道更加順暢,從外部環境上為其穫得更多的財政轉移支付創造瞭條件。此外,多維度的檢驗也為深入瞭解財政轉移支付分配規則的缺陷以及如何增進財政轉移支付分配的公平性提供瞭經驗證據。
중국장기존재적“성향이원분치”제도도치자원배치정현명현적성시편향특정,가극료성향불평등,야불리우사회화해。기우재정전이지부적시각,문장연구발현,“성직관현”개혁통과이하량개궤제뉴전료자원적성시편향성배치:제일,“성직관현”개혁제고료현향경제발전격려,증가료현향공공복무지출책임병제고료현급지구자금필배능력,유리우현향재기유분배규칙하획취경다적재정전이지부。제이,“성직관현”개선료기층정부적재정지위,감소료상급정부적자금절류;동시사현할구공공수구향상적전체거도경가순창,종외부배경상위기획득경다적재정전이지부창조료조건。차외,다유도적검험야위심입료해재정전이지부분배규칙적결함이급여하증진재정전이지부분배적공평성제공료경험증거。
lhe long-term dual urban-rural system in Ghma results in the obvious urban-t)las characteristic of resources allocation, exacerbating the urban-rural inequality and also being harmful to social harmony. From the perspective of fiscal transfer payments, this paper arrives at the conclusion that the reform of counties directly controlled by province-level governments turns the urban-bias resources allocation over through two mechanisms as follows: on the one hand, the reform increases the incentives of economic development at county and town levels, their re- sponsibilities of public services spending at county and town levels and county-level fund matc- hing abilities and is conducive to more fiscal transfer payments at county and town levels under existing allocation rule; on the other hand, the reform improves the fiscal status of local govern- ments, reduces funds intercepted by governments at higher levels, makes upward delivery channel of count-level public demand more smooth and creates a helpful external environment for the counties to get more fiscal transfer payments. In addition, a multi-dimensional test also provides evidence for deep understanding of the defects of allocation rules of fiscal transfer payments and how to improve the fairness of fiscal transfer payments allocation.