社会科学
社會科學
사회과학
Journal of Social Sciences
2014年
2期
83~90
,共null页
所有权保留合同 天然孳息 归属 《合同法》第163条
所有權保留閤同 天然孳息 歸屬 《閤同法》第163條
소유권보류합동 천연자식 귀속 《합동법》제163조
Ownership-reserved Contract; Natural Fruits; Ownership; The Section 163 of The Contract Law
天然孳息的归属与原物所有权密不可分,《合同法》第163条规定的买卖合同孳息归属的“交付主义”规则以“所有权已经转移或者最终能转移至买受人”为适用前提,具有合理性。《物权法》第116条与《合同法》第163条并不冲突,所有权保留合同中天然孳息归属适用《合同法》第163条的结论符合民法精神,亦即“动产所有权保留,天然孳息所有权移转”,且当事人约定优先。
天然孳息的歸屬與原物所有權密不可分,《閤同法》第163條規定的買賣閤同孳息歸屬的“交付主義”規則以“所有權已經轉移或者最終能轉移至買受人”為適用前提,具有閤理性。《物權法》第116條與《閤同法》第163條併不遲突,所有權保留閤同中天然孳息歸屬適用《閤同法》第163條的結論符閤民法精神,亦即“動產所有權保留,天然孳息所有權移轉”,且噹事人約定優先。
천연자식적귀속여원물소유권밀불가분,《합동법》제163조규정적매매합동자식귀속적“교부주의”규칙이“소유권이경전이혹자최종능전이지매수인”위괄용전제,구유합이성。《물권법》제116조여《합동법》제163조병불충돌,소유권보류합동중천연자식귀속괄용《합동법》제163조적결론부합민법정신,역즉“동산소유권보류,천연자식소유권이전”,차당사인약정우선。
Who is the owner of the natural fruits is intimately associated with who owned the original. The legal rules used to judge who is the owner of the natural fruits in sales contract according to section 163 of the Contract Law is reasonable, which said the natural fruits belong to whom is decided by if the seller delivery the subject to the vendee. This article can only be used when the vendee has been the owner of the subject or the buyer can be the owner in law. The section 163 of the Contract Law and the section 116 of the Property Law are not conflicted. Who is the owner of the natural fruits in ownership-reserved contract should be judged by the section 163 of the Contract Law and the conclusion can reflect the spirit the civil law. In other words, when the ownership of subject is reserved, the buyer has been the owner of the natural fruits, only when the seller and the vendee has agreement.