复旦学报:社会科学版
複旦學報:社會科學版
복단학보:사회과학판
Fudan Journal(Social Sciences Edition)
2014年
1期
147~156
,共null页
维权 维稳 群体性行动 公民参与 决策过程 社会稳定风险评估
維權 維穩 群體性行動 公民參與 決策過程 社會穩定風險評估
유권 유은 군체성행동 공민삼여 결책과정 사회은정풍험평고
rights protection ; maintaining stability ; collective action ; public participation ; policy making process ;risk assessment of the social stability
一个开放、公正和充满活力的社会秩序是中国持续繁荣和长治久安的基础。当前维护社会稳定具有长期的意义。将群体性行动释放出的能量转化为实质性的公民参与,已成为“维稳”模式转变的关键点。维稳与维权在逻辑上具有统一的可能,这就是把“事后的抗争行为”转化为“事前的积极参与行为”。影响这个转变的关键因素是地方决策过程的转型。当下的重大决策之社会稳定风险评估机制旨在把维权系统与维稳系统两者统一起来。以推进社会稳定风险评估机制为契机,推动地方公共决策从相对封闭的、以领导(个体或集体)偏好为主的决策方式转向一个开放、多元、包容和协商的决策过程,这是建构维权与维稳统一的制度通道的关键。因此,重大决策之社会稳定风险评估机制具有推进决策过程转型的潜在功用。
一箇開放、公正和充滿活力的社會秩序是中國持續繁榮和長治久安的基礎。噹前維護社會穩定具有長期的意義。將群體性行動釋放齣的能量轉化為實質性的公民參與,已成為“維穩”模式轉變的關鍵點。維穩與維權在邏輯上具有統一的可能,這就是把“事後的抗爭行為”轉化為“事前的積極參與行為”。影響這箇轉變的關鍵因素是地方決策過程的轉型。噹下的重大決策之社會穩定風險評估機製旨在把維權繫統與維穩繫統兩者統一起來。以推進社會穩定風險評估機製為契機,推動地方公共決策從相對封閉的、以領導(箇體或集體)偏好為主的決策方式轉嚮一箇開放、多元、包容和協商的決策過程,這是建構維權與維穩統一的製度通道的關鍵。因此,重大決策之社會穩定風險評估機製具有推進決策過程轉型的潛在功用。
일개개방、공정화충만활력적사회질서시중국지속번영화장치구안적기출。당전유호사회은정구유장기적의의。장군체성행동석방출적능량전화위실질성적공민삼여,이성위“유은”모식전변적관건점。유은여유권재라집상구유통일적가능,저취시파“사후적항쟁행위”전화위“사전적적겁삼여행위”。영향저개전변적관건인소시지방결책과정적전형。당하적중대결책지사회은정풍험평고궤제지재파유권계통여유은계통량자통일기래。이추진사회은정풍험평고궤제위계궤,추동지방공공결책종상대봉폐적、이령도(개체혹집체)편호위주적결책방식전향일개개방、다원、포용화협상적결책과정,저시건구유권여유은통일적제도통도적관건。인차,중대결책지사회은정풍험평고궤제구유추진결책과정전형적잠재공용。
Today it is of long-term significance to maintain social stability as an open, vigorous and impartial social order provides a solid foundation for China's sustained prosperity and peace. The key point of shifting the stability maintenance pattern lies in the transformation of the energy released from the collective action to the civic participation. Rights claim and stability maintenance are possible to be unified in logical sense in that the resistance action afterwards is supposed to be transferred into the active participation beforehand. The key factor is the transition of the local policy-making process. The current risk assessment mechanism of social stability concerning the major policy-making is intended for achieving the unity of the two. Taking the mechanism promotion as an opportunity, efforts are made to propel the local public policy-making process from a relatively-closed leaders (individual/group) - preference-oriented pattern to an open, tolerant, consultative and pluralistic one, which is the crux of establishing the institutional channel to unify the rights claim and stability maintenance. Therefore, it can be concluded that the promotion of the risk assessment mechanism of social stability concerning the major policy-making functions as a way to potentially advance the transition of policy-making process.