CAJ | 학술논문

《隐秀》作为刘勰探讨文学创作的重要篇章，此前并未得到应有的重视，此中有三个方面的原因：第一，《隐秀》“补文”存在真伪之议；第二，在《隐秀》“残文”中，“隐秀”的概念、内涵和审美效应并不难判定，学界对此实际也无大分歧；第三，学界一般都承认刘勰的“隐秀”论必然以《周易》为论述的依据和起点，对此本无疑义。但细论起来，这三个问题却都指向了《隐秀》文本的超越性阐释这一核心问题。对于真伪的问题，我们应超越那些客观牵连，而关注那些超越性的本然体验。在此，补文所体现的易学思想，确实与“残文”乃至全书一致；《周易》那种超越性的思维范式才是“象外之隐”的本源，中国意境美学的发轫，实与《周易》息息相关。
《은수》작위류협탐토문학창작적중요편장，차전병미득도응유적중시，차중유삼개방면적원인：제일，《은수》“보문”존재진위지의；제이，재《은수》“잔문”중，“은수”적개념、내함화심미효응병불난판정，학계대차실제야무대분기；제삼，학계일반도승인류협적“은수”론필연이《주역》위논술적의거화기점，대차본무의의。단세론기래，저삼개문제각도지향료《은수》문본적초월성천석저일핵심문제。대우진위적문제，아문응초월나사객관견련，이관주나사초월성적본연체험。재차，보문소체현적역학사상，학실여“잔문”내지전서일치；《주역》나충초월성적사유범식재시“상외지은”적본원，중국의경미학적발인，실여《주역》식식상관。
Though it was an important chapter related to literal creation discussed by Liu Xie 刘勰 465-5201 in his Wenxin diaolong 文心雕龙（lit., the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons）, ＂Yinxiu 隐秀＂（lit., Hidden Meanings and Aphorisms} had not been sufficiently valued. There are mainly three reasons for this： 1 ） There had been debates over the authenticity of the ＂Supplemen- ted Texts＂ in the chapter; 2） In the ＂Fragments＂ of the chapter, the concept, connotations, and aesthetic effects of the term ＂Yinx- iu＂ are not difficult to determine and there is no sharp discrepancies on this in the academic circle; 3} The academic circle admits that Li Xie＇ s argument in ＂Yinxiu＂ was based on the Zhou Changes and scholars had no doubts about it. A careful study of the chap- ter can show that all the above-mentioned three issues point to the transcendent interpretation -- the kernel issue -- of the text of the chapter. For the first issue, we ought to transcend those objective ties and pay attention to those transcendent experiences. The idea embodied by the ＂Supplemented Texts＂ was indeed congruent with that conceived in the ＂Fragments＂ and the whole book while the paradigm of transcendent thinking of the Zhou Changes was the source and origin of the ＂hidden meanings beyond images.＂ There- fore, the emergence of Chinese aesthetics with artistic conception was actually closely related to the Zhou Changes.