陕西师范大学学报：哲学社会科学版
陝西師範大學學報：哲學社會科學版
협서사범대학학보：철학사회과학판
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
2014年
1期
92~99
,共null页
曹丕 本同末异 文源五经 儒家思想 四科八体 目录学
曹丕 本同末異 文源五經 儒傢思想 四科八體 目錄學
조비 본동말이 문원오경 유가사상 사과팔체 목록학
Cao Pi; different end from the same source; the five best classics of Chinese literature; Confu- cianism; eight styles in the four disciplines; bibliography
曹丕的文体学思想中，最具争议的是“文本同而末异”这一命题，尤其是何为“本同”众说纷纭。“本同”指各种文体都源出五经，这反映了曹丕的思想是以儒家为主的。从归纳并类着眼，“四科八体”的“四科”就是“四分法”，它对真德秀的“四目”法产生了影响，而其源头则要溯至孔门四科、类书分类以及目录学“四部”等。
曹丕的文體學思想中，最具爭議的是“文本同而末異”這一命題，尤其是何為“本同”衆說紛紜。“本同”指各種文體都源齣五經，這反映瞭曹丕的思想是以儒傢為主的。從歸納併類著眼，“四科八體”的“四科”就是“四分法”，它對真德秀的“四目”法產生瞭影響，而其源頭則要溯至孔門四科、類書分類以及目錄學“四部”等。
조비적문체학사상중，최구쟁의적시“문본동이말이”저일명제，우기시하위“본동”음설분운。“본동”지각충문체도원출오경，저반영료조비적사상시이유가위주적。종귀납병류착안，“사과팔체”적“사과”취시“사분법”，타대진덕수적“사목”법산생료영향，이기원두칙요소지공문사과、류서분류이급목록학“사부”등。
Style of the source is the same, however, end is different. It is a controversial problem in CaoPi＇ s stylistics thought. Opinions vary about What is the ＂same source＂. Through the comprehensive analysis of many people＇ s point of view, I think all kinds of style comes from the five classics. This illustrates the Cao Pi with Confucianism. Cao Pi broke the Confucian thought, this idea is questionable. About the ＂four subjects and eight kinds of style＂, it is believed that the classification of the ＂eight kinds of style＂ is a literary style. This article focuses on the induction. It is pointed out that ＂four subjects＂ is the ＂four classification＂. Its impact on Zhen Dexiu. It is the source of Confucius of the four subjects, and the classification of books as well as the bibliography ＂ four parts＂, etc.
