CAJ | 학술논문

以80名大学女生为被试，在关系自我理论的框架下，采用移情研究的双时段范式，以实验法考察了关系自我和重要他人对于陌生人印象偏好的影响。结果发现：在无提示的条件下，与重要他人相似的陌生人得到更多的印象偏好；在有提示的条件下，这种由相似性而产生的偏好会显著降低。证明了重要他人对陌生人印象偏好的影响，并讨论了关系自我在其中发挥的中介作用。
이80명대학녀생위피시，재관계자아이론적광가하，채용이정연구적쌍시단범식，이실험법고찰료관계자아화중요타인대우맥생인인상편호적영향。결과발현：재무제시적조건하，여중요타인상사적맥생인득도경다적인상편호；재유제시적조건하，저충유상사성이산생적편호회현저강저。증명료중요타인대맥생인인상편호적영향，병토론료관계자아재기중발휘적중개작용。
Impression preference, the likes or dislikes when facing a stranger, is an assessment component of First Impression. The ob jective of this research is to explore the mental mechanism of the process from the perspective of relational self. If a stranger is similar to oneg Significant Other （SO）, which will activate the corresponding relational self and, at the same time, the preference for SO will be transferred to the stranger. It is transference, fundamentally an implicit and automatic process, and it is worth to note whether it can be controlled or not. In this paper, the researchers planned to test and verify the abovementioned process, especially its controllability. Based on the theory of relational self, a 2 x 2 x 2 mixed experimental design was adopted with three independent variables ： relativity （ betweensub jects factor）, that is whom the stranger is relative toSO or acquaintance; similarity （withinsubjects factor）, that is whether the stranger is similar to SO/acquaintance or not; and hint （betweensubjects factor）, that is whether to remind the similarity or not. One point should be noted that researchers designated mother as SO and classmate as acquaintance, the former suggests an intimate relationship, while the latter just a nodding acquaintance. The dependent variable was impression preference for strangers. The twosession paradigm of transference study was used in the procedure. Firstly, in order to get participants initial data, information questionnaires about a specific SO/acquaintance were made based on the literature and the interview. Given that different role experiences could be a noise variable, 80 female participants were selected by clustering sampling from sophomore students. They filled in the questionnaires and wrote down their IDs. After that, for each partici pant, a specific questionnaire of impression preference for strangers was made based on the information collected. Secondly, two weeks later, the participants took part in the posttest but they really didni realize its relevance to the pretest. This time they needed to deter mine their preference for two strangers respectively （ the one was similar to the former SO/acquaintance, the other was not）. Three questions were provided for each stranger, and the scales ranging from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating more preference. The ma nipulation of the hint variable was dependent on the instruction. That is, before making a decision, the participants were told to re call whether the stranger was similar to one of his SOs or acquaintances. It was expected that the hint could interrupt the automatic mental process, so that participants could make more rational judgments. The conclusions drawn from the experiment： 1. When the stranger was similar to ones SO, compared to the dissimilar one, he would get more preference, F（ 1,76） = 22. 463, p 〈 . 001 ,n2 =. 228. On the contrary, whether the stranger was similar to one acquaintance or not, there was no significant difference in impression preference. 2. Hint reduced the level of impression preference when the stranger was similar to SO ,F（ 1,76） =4. 741, p 〈 . 05 ,n2 =. 059. The research suggests that, SO could influence the impression preference for strangers, and the process could be controlled. There were two main contributions in this research. One was to reinforce the idea that SO could influence one＇s transference to the similar strangers by adding the acquaintance factor; the other one was to suggest that the automatic process of impression preference could be controlled. In particular, the mediated effect of relational self was commented in the discussion section.