CAJ | 학술논문

对于《古兰经》中是否存在有喻义的经文，伊斯兰各教义学派几乎都提出了自己的看法。赞成存在喻义者以穆阿泰齐勒为主，反对存在喻义者以伊本·泰米叶最为出名。喻义与实义之争论，与各派的教义密切相关，分歧凸现了各派在真主本体与属性上认识的差异。双方围绕《古兰经》的思辨很大程度上是中世纪伊斯兰哲学思辨的启蒙，也是伊斯兰哲学思辨的延续。它极大地推动了人们对《古兰经》的认知，对于我们今天理解《古兰经》仍有着积极的借鉴意义。
대우《고란경》중시부존재유유의적경문，이사란각교의학파궤호도제출료자기적간법。찬성존재유의자이목아태제륵위주，반대존재유의자이이본·태미협최위출명。유의여실의지쟁론，여각파적교의밀절상관，분기철현료각파재진주본체여속성상인식적차이。쌍방위요《고란경》적사변흔대정도상시중세기이사란철학사변적계몽，야시이사란철학사변적연속。타겁대지추동료인문대《고란경》적인지，대우아문금천리해《고란경》잉유착적겁적차감의의。
Abstract：Almost all teachings of the Islamic schools put forward their views about the figurative expression and the real expression of the ＂Quran＂. The representative of those who believe there are figurative meanings existing in the Quran is Muatazile and the person famous for opposing the former idea is Ibn -Taimiye. The controversy between these two ideas, which is very closely related to the doctrine of various parties, actually highlights their differences in understanding the body and attributes of Allah. The dispute around the ＂Quran＂ not only largely en- lightened the critical thought of the medieval Islamic philosophy, but also is a continuation of the Islamic philo- sophical speculation. It has greatly promoted the people＇s understanding of the ＂Quran＂ and still benefit for us to- day.