心理科学进展
心理科學進展
심이과학진전
Advances In Psychological Science
2014年
2期
205~219
,共null页
张阳阳 饶俪琳 梁竹苑 周媛 李纾
張暘暘 饒儷琳 樑竹苑 週媛 李紓
장양양 요려림 량죽원 주원 리서
风险决策 决策过程 补偿性规则 非补偿性规则 眼动 ERP fMRI
風險決策 決策過程 補償性規則 非補償性規則 眼動 ERP fMRI
풍험결책 결책과정 보상성규칙 비보상성규칙 안동 ERP fMRI
risky choice; decision process; compensatory rule; non-compensatory rule; eye-tracking; ERP;fMRI
风险决策是人类赖以生存和发展的重大决策。如何进行风险决策是人类不断认识和改造世界过程中遇到的未解之谜。主流风险理论认为,风险决策是一个补偿性的、期望值最大化的过程;而非主流的风险理论则认为,风险决策是非补偿性的,并不遵循期望法则所假设的加权求和等过程。这一谜团为何一直没有得以破解,或许是因为我们未找到揭示其心理过程的令人信服的证据。近10年来,我们针对风险决策过程,借助行为实验、眼动记录法、事件相关电位、功能磁共振成像等技术,系统探索风险决策的心理和神经机制,为回答“风险决策是否遵循补偿性规则”这一问题提供了汇聚性证据。本文依据期望法则所假设的概率函数推导、加权过程、加权求和过程、总分最大化等步骤,对这些研究进行梳理与回顾,以期加深人们对风险决策机制的理解,并为建立、健全与风险决策相关的政策、法律法规提供理论依据。
風險決策是人類賴以生存和髮展的重大決策。如何進行風險決策是人類不斷認識和改造世界過程中遇到的未解之謎。主流風險理論認為,風險決策是一箇補償性的、期望值最大化的過程;而非主流的風險理論則認為,風險決策是非補償性的,併不遵循期望法則所假設的加權求和等過程。這一謎糰為何一直沒有得以破解,或許是因為我們未找到揭示其心理過程的令人信服的證據。近10年來,我們針對風險決策過程,藉助行為實驗、眼動記錄法、事件相關電位、功能磁共振成像等技術,繫統探索風險決策的心理和神經機製,為迴答“風險決策是否遵循補償性規則”這一問題提供瞭彙聚性證據。本文依據期望法則所假設的概率函數推導、加權過程、加權求和過程、總分最大化等步驟,對這些研究進行梳理與迴顧,以期加深人們對風險決策機製的理解,併為建立、健全與風險決策相關的政策、法律法規提供理論依據。
풍험결책시인류뢰이생존화발전적중대결책。여하진행풍험결책시인류불단인식화개조세계과정중우도적미해지미。주류풍험이론인위,풍험결책시일개보상성적、기망치최대화적과정;이비주류적풍험이론칙인위,풍험결책시비보상성적,병불준순기망법칙소가설적가권구화등과정。저일미단위하일직몰유득이파해,혹허시인위아문미조도게시기심리과정적령인신복적증거。근10년래,아문침대풍험결책과정,차조행위실험、안동기록법、사건상관전위、공능자공진성상등기술,계통탐색풍험결책적심리화신경궤제,위회답“풍험결책시부준순보상성규칙”저일문제제공료회취성증거。본문의거기망법칙소가설적개솔함수추도、가권과정、가권구화과정、총분최대화등보취,대저사연구진행소리여회고,이기가심인문대풍험결책궤제적리해,병위건립、건전여풍험결책상관적정책、법율법규제공이론의거。
Decision making under risk is vital to human survival and development. How to make a risky choice is a compelling question facing scientists today. Mainstream theories of decision making under risk hold that risky choices are based on a compensatory expectation-maximizing process. Some researchers, however, argued that risky choice is based on a non-compensatory process, foregoing weighting and summing. People rely on only one (or a few) key dimension (s) rather than integrating information from all dimensions of an option for making a decision. To tackle this question and further our knowledge of the mechanism underlying human decision making, concrete and convincing evidence based on psychological process is required. Therefore, over the past decade, we designed and conducted a series of behavioral and neural experiments to systematically investigate the process of risky decision making. We organized and presented our experiments in line with the computation steps assumed by the expectation rule, that is, from the process of deriving probability functions, to weighting process, to weighting and summing process, and then to maximizing overall values. This review illustrates how these "independent" studies can help us to gradually understand the global process underlying risky choices, thereby providing psychology- and neuroscience-based theoretical foundations for establishing and stipulating risk related policies, laws, and regulations.