CAJ | 학술논문

修辞学是司法判决可接受性概念的理论来源，它关心裁判听众对裁判的态度，强调判决通过修辞对听众的说服；说服不能保证裁判证成的合理性，因此需强调以体现交往理性的法律商谈为路径去实现合理的可接受性。修辞论辩作为一种具体方法论，是对逻辑功能缺陷的填补和主体行为的互动；以法律修辞的方式可提升司法判决的合理可接受性。
수사학시사법판결가접수성개념적이론래원，타관심재판은음대재판적태도，강조판결통과수사대은음적설복；설복불능보증재판증성적합이성，인차수강조이체현교왕이성적법률상담위로경거실현합리적가접수성。수사론변작위일충구체방법론，시대라집공능결함적전보화주체행위적호동；이법률수사적방식가제승사법판결적합리가접수성。
Rhetoric is the theoretical source of the acceptability concept of judicial decisions, which concern the audience at-titude to the referee, stressed that the decision by rhetorical persuasion to convince the audience, can not guarantee the rational-ity of the referee card, so that the theory of discourse to achieve rational acceptability. Rhetoric as a specific methodology, is the interaction of fill and behavior logic function defects. Through the Empirical Legal Rhetoric to the case in the analysis, to explore the rational acceptability to promote judicial rulings to Legal Rhetoric way.