中国工业经济
中國工業經濟
중국공업경제
China Industrial Economy
2014年
2期
97~108
,共null页
国有企业 创新效率 DEA—Malmquist指数
國有企業 創新效率 DEA—Malmquist指數
국유기업 창신효솔 DEA—Malmquist지수
state-owned enterprises; innovative efficiency; method of Malmquist index based on DEA
传统观点只强调国有企业本身的生产效率损失,而忽略了创新效率损失。很多经验研究虽然证明了技术创新才是影响企业效率的主要因素,但是实证检验很少.因此,本文针对国有企业的创新效率进行系统的实证分析。运用基于DEA的Malmquist指数方法.对5大类高新技术行业2000一2011年国有企业与民营企业技术创新的相关数据,以民营企业为参照对象。对国有企业的创新效率进行分解、评价和测试。研究结果发现,在分行业比较中,发现除航空航天器制造业外,其余四个行业的国有企业创新效率都明显低于民营企业。航空航天器制造业数据可比性较差.可能与该行业基本全部由国有企业经营有关:在全部行业总体效率比较中,发现国有企业的创新效率普遍低于民营企业,剔除航空航天器制造业数据后,两者之间差距更加明显。总之,与民营企业相比,国有企业确实存在不容忽视的创新效率损失.进一步分析发现寻租是导致国有企业创新效率低下的主要原因,并指出可以从遏制国有企业寻租活动、增加市场竞争程度和激发企业家的创新才能三个方面出发.提高国有企业创新效率。
傳統觀點隻彊調國有企業本身的生產效率損失,而忽略瞭創新效率損失。很多經驗研究雖然證明瞭技術創新纔是影響企業效率的主要因素,但是實證檢驗很少.因此,本文針對國有企業的創新效率進行繫統的實證分析。運用基于DEA的Malmquist指數方法.對5大類高新技術行業2000一2011年國有企業與民營企業技術創新的相關數據,以民營企業為參照對象。對國有企業的創新效率進行分解、評價和測試。研究結果髮現,在分行業比較中,髮現除航空航天器製造業外,其餘四箇行業的國有企業創新效率都明顯低于民營企業。航空航天器製造業數據可比性較差.可能與該行業基本全部由國有企業經營有關:在全部行業總體效率比較中,髮現國有企業的創新效率普遍低于民營企業,剔除航空航天器製造業數據後,兩者之間差距更加明顯。總之,與民營企業相比,國有企業確實存在不容忽視的創新效率損失.進一步分析髮現尋租是導緻國有企業創新效率低下的主要原因,併指齣可以從遏製國有企業尋租活動、增加市場競爭程度和激髮企業傢的創新纔能三箇方麵齣髮.提高國有企業創新效率。
전통관점지강조국유기업본신적생산효솔손실,이홀략료창신효솔손실。흔다경험연구수연증명료기술창신재시영향기업효솔적주요인소,단시실증검험흔소.인차,본문침대국유기업적창신효솔진행계통적실증분석。운용기우DEA적Malmquist지수방법.대5대류고신기술행업2000일2011년국유기업여민영기업기술창신적상관수거,이민영기업위삼조대상。대국유기업적창신효솔진행분해、평개화측시。연구결과발현,재분행업비교중,발현제항공항천기제조업외,기여사개행업적국유기업창신효솔도명현저우민영기업。항공항천기제조업수거가비성교차.가능여해행업기본전부유국유기업경영유관:재전부행업총체효솔비교중,발현국유기업적창신효솔보편저우민영기업,척제항공항천기제조업수거후,량자지간차거경가명현。총지,여민영기업상비,국유기업학실존재불용홀시적창신효솔손실.진일보분석발현심조시도치국유기업창신효솔저하적주요원인,병지출가이종알제국유기업심조활동、증가시장경쟁정도화격발기업가적창신재능삼개방면출발.제고국유기업창신효솔。
In traditional view, it only emphasizes the productivity efficiency loss of state-owned enterprises, while ignores the innovation efficiency loss. Many qualitative studies have proved the technical innovation is the main factor affecting the efficiency of enterprises, but empirical tests are few. Therefore, in this study, we utilize Malmquist index method based on DEA to disaggregate, evaluate and test the innovation efficiency of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises in 5 major Chinese high-tech industries. In the innovation efficiency comparison of sub-sector industry, it shows that except for aerospace vehicle manufacturing industry, the state-owned enterprises' innovation efficiency in all the industries is significantly lower than private enterprises'. Because the aerospace industry is basically state-owned enterprises, it's data comparability is poorer. In the innovation efficiency comparison of entire industries, it shows that the innovation efficiency of state-owned enterprises is generally lower than private enterprises. Excluding the data of aerospace vehicle manufacturing, the gap between them is more obvious. In a word, the state-owned enterprises have the problem of innovation efficiency loss. We find that rent-seeking is the main reason leading to innovation inefficient of state-owned enterprises. At last, we point out that China need to take the road of intensive innovation efficiency in the future by curbing rent-seeking activities of state-owned enterprises, increasing the market competition and stimulating entrepreneurial innovation ability.