西北农林科技大学学报:社会科学版
西北農林科技大學學報:社會科學版
서북농림과기대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry(Social Science)
2014年
2期
134~139
,共null页
基本公共服务 财政支出 泰尔指数
基本公共服務 財政支齣 泰爾指數
기본공공복무 재정지출 태이지수
basic public service; financial expenditure; Theil index
基本公共服务是当前我国政府执政实践和学界理论探讨的热点。近年来,我国在社会保障、教育和卫生保健基本公共服务的财政支出逐渐增长,但仍显著低于其他世界主要国家,且存在支出结构失衡的问题。另外,我国的基本公共服务也存在着区域间的不均衡,一方面体现在城乡间的差距,另一方面体现在不同地区间的差异。比如占全国人口4.2%的北京、天津、上海享受着全国15%以上的教育、社会保障和医疗资源。为提高我国基本公共服务水平,鉴于不同地区的能力和效率差异,相对于基本公共服务投入的增加,合理的供给机制、多元的供给主体、灵活的结构体系和高效的分配制度更有助于我国基瓠公共服务体系的建设。
基本公共服務是噹前我國政府執政實踐和學界理論探討的熱點。近年來,我國在社會保障、教育和衛生保健基本公共服務的財政支齣逐漸增長,但仍顯著低于其他世界主要國傢,且存在支齣結構失衡的問題。另外,我國的基本公共服務也存在著區域間的不均衡,一方麵體現在城鄉間的差距,另一方麵體現在不同地區間的差異。比如佔全國人口4.2%的北京、天津、上海享受著全國15%以上的教育、社會保障和醫療資源。為提高我國基本公共服務水平,鑒于不同地區的能力和效率差異,相對于基本公共服務投入的增加,閤理的供給機製、多元的供給主體、靈活的結構體繫和高效的分配製度更有助于我國基瓠公共服務體繫的建設。
기본공공복무시당전아국정부집정실천화학계이론탐토적열점。근년래,아국재사회보장、교육화위생보건기본공공복무적재정지출축점증장,단잉현저저우기타세계주요국가,차존재지출결구실형적문제。령외,아국적기본공공복무야존재착구역간적불균형,일방면체현재성향간적차거,령일방면체현재불동지구간적차이。비여점전국인구4.2%적북경、천진、상해향수착전국15%이상적교육、사회보장화의료자원。위제고아국기본공공복무수평,감우불동지구적능력화효솔차이,상대우기본공공복무투입적증가,합리적공급궤제、다원적공급주체、령활적결구체계화고효적분배제도경유조우아국기호공공복무체계적건설。
Currently, basic public service is a hot topic in the government's ruling practice and the theoretic discussion. In recent years, China's fiscal spending for social security, education and health care increased gradual- ly, but was still significantly lower than that of other major countries in the world, and there is a problem of the imbalance in the structure of expenditures. In addition, uneven basic public service exists among regions, and it is, on one hand, reflected in the gap between urban and rural areas, and on the other hand, in the differences between various regions. For example, Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai, accounting for 4.2~ of the country's population, enjoy more than 15~ of the nation's resources of education, social security and health care. In order to improve basic level of public service of the whole country, in view of different capacity and efficiency of different regions, a reasonable mechanism of supply, diversity of suppliers, flexible structures and efficient distribution systems are more helpful than the increase of input in basic public service.