CAJ | 학술논문

新闻史是一门科学。从事新闻史研究，须有科学的方法和严谨的态度——这虽是一个基本问题，但时至今日仍不时困扰着我们，亟需高度重视。本文从抽样方法与史料研究的角度入手，就姜英等所著《近代中国新闻学界对外国新闻事业的研究概况（1935—1949）》一文中出现的样本容量不足、代表性不明显、准确性不到位以及参考文献注释不妥等问题进行商榷，藉此将笔者对于新闻史学研究方法和态度的看法，以实例加以证明。
신문사시일문과학。종사신문사연구，수유과학적방법화엄근적태도——저수시일개기본문제，단시지금일잉불시곤우착아문，극수고도중시。본문종추양방법여사료연구적각도입수，취강영등소저《근대중국신문학계대외국신문사업적연구개황（1935—1949）》일문중출현적양본용량불족、대표성불명현、준학성불도위이급삼고문헌주석불타등문제진행상각，자차장필자대우신문사학연구방법화태도적간법，이실례가이증명。
The history of journalism is a science. It requires scientific methods and a rigorous attitude. This is a basic awareness, yet it is still a problem for us and demands immediate attention. Based on the discussion with Jiang Ying and others concerning their paper ＂An Overview of the Studies of Foreign Journalism by Chinese Journalism Academia （1935-1949）＂, this article proceeds from the perspective of historical data investigation to analyze the problems of their paper,including insufficient samples, limitation in representation, lack of accuracy, and improper annotation. This case study also presents the author＇s understanding of the appropriate methods and attitude for researches on the history of journalism.