CAJ | 학술논문

20世纪初叶以来，国内外学界的中古士族研究，经历了从日本两大学派的论战、到欧美哥大学派与港台新亚学派双峰并峙、最后由大陆学界独领风骚的典范转移。中外学者的理论基础分别是立足于中国中古社会的连续性和独立性，使用历史学、社会学、人类学等方法，围绕中古士族权力的生成和来源等课题，展开激烈的讨论，形成若干富有启示的成果和贡献。中古士族权力的来源究竟是高贵的血统、家传的学术，还是依附于皇权主导的官僚机构，决定中古政治社会的基本性格是士族政治还是皇权政治。不同理论分野下的学术交锋同中有异，异中有同，共同构成中古士族研究的学术版图。地域集团、政治群体、士族系谱、阶层流动等介于微观和宏观维度之间的选题仍然是士族政治研究可以继续拓展、更新换代乃至深化考察的领域。
20세기초협이래，국내외학계적중고사족연구，경력료종일본량대학파적론전、도구미가대학파여항태신아학파쌍봉병치、최후유대륙학계독령풍소적전범전이。중외학자적이론기출분별시립족우중국중고사회적련속성화독립성，사용역사학、사회학、인류학등방법，위요중고사족권력적생성화래원등과제，전개격렬적토론，형성약간부유계시적성과화공헌。중고사족권력적래원구경시고귀적혈통、가전적학술，환시의부우황권주도적관료궤구，결정중고정치사회적기본성격시사족정치환시황권정치。불동이론분야하적학술교봉동중유이，이중유동，공동구성중고사족연구적학술판도。지역집단、정치군체、사족계보、계층류동등개우미관화굉관유도지간적선제잉연시사족정치연구가이계속탁전、경신환대내지심화고찰적영역。
As the 20th century had progressed, the study of the aristocratic families at home and abroad underwent a paradigm shift from the debate between Kyoto school and Tokyo school, the development of the Columbia school and New Asia school, then to the flourish of the internal academic circle. Many Chinese and foreign scholars respectively maintained whether the society of medieval China was bureaucratic or aristocratic. Using the appropriate methods, they studied the aristocratic families around the origin of power. Whether the power rooted in the noble lineage or the bureaucracy determined the character of Chinese society. The different schools constituted the academic dominion. The scholars will discuss the following issues centering around these themes： geographical group, political group, genealogies of aristocratic families, social mobility, etc.