中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2014年
3期
108~115
,共null页
农地城市流转 农户福利效应 综合评判
農地城市流轉 農戶福利效應 綜閤評判
농지성시류전 농호복리효응 종합평판
rural-urban land conversion; household welfare effect; comprehensive evaluation
农地城市流转是城市化过程中普遍的社会经济现象.农地城市流转前后农户福利效应是农民在此过程中生活状况的综合反映.本文选择武汉城市圈中的武汉和咸宁作为研究区域,针对两地的调查数据,考虑福利评价的模糊性和灰度,尝试运用灰色模糊综合评判方法,从组织生产、经济收入、健康与休闲、社会保障、居住条件与环境、社会参与、子女教育、社会公平八种农户家庭功能性活动选择评价指标,对研究区域农地城市流转的农户福利效应进行测度、评判.研究结果显示,农地流转使得农户家庭总福利水平从0.413下降到0.353,而对农户家庭的不同功能性活动有不同的影响方向和影响程度.农地流转使得农户的组织生产、社会保障、居住条件与环境和社会公平功能水平下降,使得农户的经济收入、健康与休闲、社会参与和子女教育功能水平上升.研究表明当前的补偿方式、补偿金额难以改进被征地农户福利,也不能改善农户生活水平.
農地城市流轉是城市化過程中普遍的社會經濟現象.農地城市流轉前後農戶福利效應是農民在此過程中生活狀況的綜閤反映.本文選擇武漢城市圈中的武漢和鹹寧作為研究區域,針對兩地的調查數據,攷慮福利評價的模糊性和灰度,嘗試運用灰色模糊綜閤評判方法,從組織生產、經濟收入、健康與休閒、社會保障、居住條件與環境、社會參與、子女教育、社會公平八種農戶傢庭功能性活動選擇評價指標,對研究區域農地城市流轉的農戶福利效應進行測度、評判.研究結果顯示,農地流轉使得農戶傢庭總福利水平從0.413下降到0.353,而對農戶傢庭的不同功能性活動有不同的影響方嚮和影響程度.農地流轉使得農戶的組織生產、社會保障、居住條件與環境和社會公平功能水平下降,使得農戶的經濟收入、健康與休閒、社會參與和子女教育功能水平上升.研究錶明噹前的補償方式、補償金額難以改進被徵地農戶福利,也不能改善農戶生活水平.
농지성시류전시성시화과정중보편적사회경제현상.농지성시류전전후농호복리효응시농민재차과정중생활상황적종합반영.본문선택무한성시권중적무한화함저작위연구구역,침대량지적조사수거,고필복리평개적모호성화회도,상시운용회색모호종합평판방법,종조직생산、경제수입、건강여휴한、사회보장、거주조건여배경、사회삼여、자녀교육、사회공평팔충농호가정공능성활동선택평개지표,대연구구역농지성시류전적농호복리효응진행측도、평판.연구결과현시,농지류전사득농호가정총복이수평종0.413하강도0.353,이대농호가정적불동공능성활동유불동적영향방향화영향정도.농지류전사득농호적조직생산、사회보장、거주조건여배경화사회공평공능수평하강,사득농호적경제수입、건강여휴한、사회삼여화자녀교육공능수평상승.연구표명당전적보상방식、보상금액난이개진피정지농호복리,야불능개선농호생활수평.
Rural-urban land conversion is associated with the process of urban development,changes in the household welfare before and after the agricultural land transfer is one of the way to measure the land acquisition＇ impact on the lives of household.This paper takes Wuhan and Xianning as the study areas.Considering the fuzzy and grayscale of welfare evaluation,both the fuzzy evaluation and Grey evaluation were combined to evaluate the welfare effect of rural-urban land conversion to household.Evaluation indicators were selected from eight rural household functional activities including organization of production,income,health and leisure,social security,living conditions and environment,social participation,children＇ s education and social equity.Results show that the household welfare effects of rural-urban land conversion are negative,and land conversion makes the welfare level of household decline from 0.413 to 0.353.Moreover,rural-urban land conversion has different influence direction and impact degree on different household functional activities.For the indicators of organization and production,social security,living conditions environment,social equity of household the land conversion has a negative effect on them; while for the indicators of income,health and leisure,social participation,children＇ s education,the land conversion＇ s influencing direction is positive.The study indicates that it is difficult to increase the landless household welfare under the current compensation criteria and pattern,so as to improve the household living standards.
