河北学刊
河北學刊
하북학간
Hebei Academic Journal
2014年
2期
148~151
,共null页
程序价值 质疑 对抗 专家辅助人
程序價值 質疑 對抗 專傢輔助人
정서개치 질의 대항 전가보조인
Procedural Value; Questioning; Confrontation; the System of Auxiliary Personnel as Expert
良好的刑事程序对于判明案件事实、确定责任归属、保障公平正义意义重大。程序控辩与平等对抗至为关键。同时,新《刑诉法》规定,诉讼参与人可申请“有专门知识的人出庭”,这是朝着增强庭审实质对抗迈出的重要一步,有助于打破“鉴定垄断”。
良好的刑事程序對于判明案件事實、確定責任歸屬、保障公平正義意義重大。程序控辯與平等對抗至為關鍵。同時,新《刑訴法》規定,訴訟參與人可申請“有專門知識的人齣庭”,這是朝著增彊庭審實質對抗邁齣的重要一步,有助于打破“鑒定壟斷”。
량호적형사정서대우판명안건사실、학정책임귀속、보장공평정의의의중대。정서공변여평등대항지위관건。동시,신《형소법》규정,소송삼여인가신청“유전문지식적인출정”,저시조착증강정심실질대항매출적중요일보,유조우타파“감정롱단”。
The greatest significance of Criminal Procedure is to ascertain criminal facts of the case, and determine the attribution of responsibility, so as to safeguard the fairness and justice. Procedural debate and adversarial equality Wherein is critical. Under the stipulation of new Criminal Procedure Law, the procedural involved may apply for "Auxiliary personnel as Expert" to the court, which towards enhancing the substantive trial to an important step. It also helps to break the "identification of monopoly".