CAJ | 학술논문

以“行政优先”为原则、“刑事先理”为例外进行行刑衔接的机制构建和程序安排，不仅是对行政犯罪本质的坚守和刑事司法使命的科学定位，而且是对行政机关首次裁决权和司法裁决终极性的尊重，更是对行政权与司法权的国家权力配置及其分权制衡机制的捍卫。因而行政执法证据不仅有必要转化为刑事诉讼证据，而且必须区别不同的证据类型，依法分别采取直接调取转化、重新收集转化、授权委托转化等不同方式进行。
이“행정우선”위원칙、“형사선리”위예외진행행형함접적궤제구건화정서안배，불부시대행정범죄본질적견수화형사사법사명적과학정위，이차시대행정궤관수차재결권화사법재결종겁성적존중，경시대행정권여사법권적국가권력배치급기분권제형궤제적한위。인이행정집법증거불부유필요전화위형사소송증거，이차필수구별불동적증거류형，의법분별채취직접조취전화、중신수집전화、수권위탁전화등불동방식진행。
The mechanism construction and procedural arrangement of keeping ＂Administrative penalty taking priority＂ as the principle and ＂criminal penalty taking priority＂ as an exception within administrative-criminal penalty connection is not only an accurate reflection of the essence of administrative crimes and a scientific definition of the mission of criminal justice, but also the safeguard of the state power assignment as well as the check and balance mechanism between the administrative power and judicial power. Thus, it is necessary to transfer the evidences collected from administrative law enforcement activities to criminal procedural evidences. Additionally, according to different types of evidence, we must use different transforming approaches, such as directly applying the evidences, recollecting the evidences and authorizing specialized organizations or experts to test the evidences, etc..