北方法学
北方法學
북방법학
NORTHERN LEGAL SCIENCE
2014年
2期
107~116
,共null页
处分原则 私法自治 理论依据 民事诉讼
處分原則 私法自治 理論依據 民事訴訟
처분원칙 사법자치 이론의거 민사소송
disposition principle private autonomy theoretical basis civil litigation
德国、日本及我国台湾地区学者一般认为处分原则的依据是私法自治原则。而我国大陆诉讼法学界对于处分原则理论依据的阐释从上世纪80年代初到现在则经历了一个微妙的变化过程，逐渐从社会主义民主原则以及“国家干预私法”的理论演变为民事权利的可处分性，并趋向回归到私法自治原则。但实际上从法学的多维视角观察，处分原则的依据绝不仅限于私法自治原则。法理法学上的权利主体理论、自然法观念与自由主义思想，宪法学上的宪政原理、法治国家与人权保障理论，民事实体法上的公私法划分与契约自由理论以及民事程序法自身的诉讼目的、诉讼价值以及程序主体性理论等均为确立处分原则的理论依据。
德國、日本及我國檯灣地區學者一般認為處分原則的依據是私法自治原則。而我國大陸訴訟法學界對于處分原則理論依據的闡釋從上世紀80年代初到現在則經歷瞭一箇微妙的變化過程，逐漸從社會主義民主原則以及“國傢榦預私法”的理論縯變為民事權利的可處分性，併趨嚮迴歸到私法自治原則。但實際上從法學的多維視角觀察，處分原則的依據絕不僅限于私法自治原則。法理法學上的權利主體理論、自然法觀唸與自由主義思想，憲法學上的憲政原理、法治國傢與人權保障理論，民事實體法上的公私法劃分與契約自由理論以及民事程序法自身的訴訟目的、訴訟價值以及程序主體性理論等均為確立處分原則的理論依據。
덕국、일본급아국태만지구학자일반인위처분원칙적의거시사법자치원칙。이아국대륙소송법학계대우처분원칙이론의거적천석종상세기80년대초도현재칙경력료일개미묘적변화과정，축점종사회주의민주원칙이급“국가간예사법”적이론연변위민사권리적가처분성，병추향회귀도사법자치원칙。단실제상종법학적다유시각관찰，처분원칙적의거절불부한우사법자치원칙。법리법학상적권리주체이론、자연법관념여자유주의사상，헌법학상적헌정원리、법치국가여인권보장이론，민사실체법상적공사법화분여계약자유이론이급민사정서법자신적소송목적、소송개치이급정서주체성이론등균위학립처분원칙적이론의거。
Scholars in Germany, Japan and Taiwan Area of China generally believe that the disposition principle is based on the principle of private autonomy. While the theoretical basis for the disposition principle interpreted by scholars on procedural laws in Mainland China has undergone a subtle developing process since the 1980s, changing from the principle of socialist democracy and theory on ＂state intervention in private law＂ to the disposable nature of the civil fights, and gradually returning to the principle of private autonomy. But from a multi - perspective of law, the theoretical basis for the principle of disposition should not be limited to the principle of private autonomy. Rather, its theoretical basis should also depend on other sources such as the jurisprudential theories on subjects of rights, conception of natural law and liberalism; ideas of constitutional- ism, the rule of law and protection of human rights in constitutional law ; theories on division of public and pri- vate laws and freedom of contract in civil substantive laws; and ideas of procedural purpose, value and subjec- tivity in civil procedural laws.
