心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2014年
2期
258~264
,共null页
时间人格 多重型 单一型 双重效价联合任务 冲突
時間人格 多重型 單一型 雙重效價聯閤任務 遲突
시간인격 다중형 단일형 쌍중효개연합임무 충돌
time personality, polychronicity, monochronicity, dual valence association task, conflict
采用内隐联想测验的修订版本双重效价联合任务范式,利用ERP技术探究不同时间分配倾向个体在执行冲突和转换任务时的执行功能,以揭示不同时间分配倾向个体在相容和不相容任务过程中脑内时程的动态变化。研究结果发现,多重组个体显示出更快的反应时;ERP结果表明,相比于多重组,单一组在不相容任务中比在相容任务中诱发了更大的N170,说明多重组个体可能更善于同时执行多项任务,而单一组执行冲突任务可能需要投入更多的注意资源。同时在认知加工的晚期阶段单一组比多重组诱发了更大的LPP,提示单一组需要更强的认知控制加工。
採用內隱聯想測驗的脩訂版本雙重效價聯閤任務範式,利用ERP技術探究不同時間分配傾嚮箇體在執行遲突和轉換任務時的執行功能,以揭示不同時間分配傾嚮箇體在相容和不相容任務過程中腦內時程的動態變化。研究結果髮現,多重組箇體顯示齣更快的反應時;ERP結果錶明,相比于多重組,單一組在不相容任務中比在相容任務中誘髮瞭更大的N170,說明多重組箇體可能更善于同時執行多項任務,而單一組執行遲突任務可能需要投入更多的註意資源。同時在認知加工的晚期階段單一組比多重組誘髮瞭更大的LPP,提示單一組需要更彊的認知控製加工。
채용내은련상측험적수정판본쌍중효개연합임무범식,이용ERP기술탐구불동시간분배경향개체재집행충돌화전환임무시적집행공능,이게시불동시간분배경향개체재상용화불상용임무과정중뇌내시정적동태변화。연구결과발현,다중조개체현시출경쾌적반응시;ERP결과표명,상비우다중조,단일조재불상용임무중비재상용임무중유발료경대적N170,설명다중조개체가능경선우동시집행다항임무,이단일조집행충돌임무가능수요투입경다적주의자원。동시재인지가공적만기계단단일조비다중조유발료경대적LPP,제시단일조수요경강적인지공제가공。
Time personality, which focuses on the personality characteristics and individual differences under the temporal context, was defined as a consistent adapting tendency and character of capabilities of individuals in time-related situations. It is a multi-level hierarchical structure of personality which was composed of four second-order factors as temporal obedience, temporal programming, temporal distribution and temporal tension. In the present study, using the technique of event-related potentials (ERPs), we applied the dual valence association task to investigate the impact of temporal distribution on executive function, and explored the temporal patterns of the brain activity when polychronic and monochronic individuals were performing the conflict task. Dual valence association task measures the interference effects presented in a double associative categorization valence task, that is, congruency /incongruence between emotional information presented in facial expressions and semantic information presented in words. Participants used two emotional valence evaluative tasks and were asked to categorize the emotional valence of positive /negative words or the emotional valence of positive/negative faces. The two-way repeated-measures analyses of variances (ANOVAs) on the accuracy (ACC) showed a significant main effect of Task type, that is compatible blocks produced higher ACC than incompatible ones. On the reaction times (RTs) however, the two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed a significant main effect of Task type and Group. Compatible blocks showed shorter RTs than incompatible ones and polychronics responded faster than monochronics. The EEG was recorded from 64 scalp sites using tin electrodes mounted in an elastic cap (Brain Products), with the references on the left and right mastoids. The vertical electrooculograms (EOGs) were recorded with electrode placed above and below the right eye. Horizontal EOG was recorded from the right orbital rim. EEG and EOG activity was amplified using a DC~100Hz bandpass and continuously sampled at 500Hz/channel. The EEG was band-pass filtered from 0.01 to 16 Hz. All electrode impedances were maintained below 5kΩ. ERP averages were computed off-line. Trials with EOG artifacts (mean EOG voltage exceeding ±80μV) and those contaminated with artifacts due to amplifier clipping, or peak-to-peak deflection exceeding ±80μV were excluded from averaging. ERP waveforms were time-locked to the onset of stimuli and the average epoch was 1000ms, including a 200ms pre-stimulus baseline. EEG activity only for correct responses in each condition was analyzed. The early N170 component was measured and analyzed at 130~190ms using three-way repeated measures ANOVAs on average amplitudes, with Groups (polychronicity, monochronicity) as a between-subjects factor, and Task type (congruent, incongruent) and eletrodes (P7, PO7, P8, PO8) as the within-subjects factors. The late LPP component around 500~700ms was conducted the same analysis at 5 electrode sites (F1, Fz, FCz, Cz, F2). The repeated-measures ANOVAs on mean amplitude of N170 showed a marginal interaction effect between Group and Task type [F(1,34) = 3.27, p = .08]. More specifically, a larger N170 was elicited in the incongruent condition than that in the congruent condition among the monochronics, suggesting that monochronics need to devote more attentional resources in face of the conflict task. As for the LPP component, monochronics showed higher positive amplitudes compared to polychronics, indicating the enhanced cognitive control processes of monochronics.