CAJ | 학술논문

本研究采用客体回溯范式考察了特征变化的连续性对维持客体连续表征的作用。实验1和实验2分别探索了形状维度上的变化方式（不变、渐变、突变）和亮度维度上的变化方式（不变、渐变、随机变化）对客体预览利化效应的影响。在特征连续条件下（不变或渐变），两个实验都获得了客体预览利化效应。而在特征不连续变化条件下（突变或随机变化），该效应消失。这些结果说明特征变化的连续性同样影响客体连续表征的维持。
본연구채용객체회소범식고찰료특정변화적련속성대유지객체련속표정적작용。실험1화실험2분별탐색료형상유도상적변화방식（불변、점변、돌변）화량도유도상적변화방식（불변、점변、수궤변화）대객체예람리화효응적영향。재특정련속조건하（불변혹점변），량개실험도획득료객체예람리화효응。이재특정불련속변화조건하（돌변혹수궤변화），해효응소실。저사결과설명특정변화적련속성동양영향객체련속표정적유지。
Background： Whether feature or spatial-temporal information is critical for maintenance of persisting object representation is still debated. The similarity theory emphasizes the role of feature information. However, object file theory proposes the spatial-temporal continuity of object position help maintain the persisting object representation. Previous studies based on the object file framework revealed that feature information alone could not support persisting object representation. However, those studies neglected the difference between the static feature and the feature change. The present study tested the hypothesis that the continuity of feature change may be a necessary condition for maintenance of persisting object representation. Method： The object reviewing paradigm was adopted. In each trial, two characters flashed briefly in two circles. Then the circles moved smoothly to vertical positions. One probe character appeared in one of circles at the end of moving. Participants made a rapid judgment on whether the character was one of the two characters appeared at the beginning of moving. If the probe was one of two characters presented before, it might appear in the congruent circle （congruent condition） or in the incongruent circle （incongruent condition）. Object Specific Preview Benefits （OSPB）, the difference between reaction times of the incongruent condition and the congruent condition, was taken as an index of how well the persisting object representation was preserved. The continuity of feature change was manipulated as a between subject factor within each experiment. There were 3 levels of continuity： No-change, Gradual-change and Abrupt-change （or Random-change）. Experiment 1 tested whether shape change continuity affected object persistence. In the No-Change condition （n = 10）, the object shape did not change during the moving. In the Gradual-Change condition （n = 17）, the object shape changed gradually from a circle to an oval shape during moving. In the Abrupt-Change condition （n = 11）, the object shape transformed between a circle and an oval shape during moving. Experiment 2 tested whether brightness change continuity affected object persistence. In the No-Change condition （n = 9）, the object brightness was constant during moving. In the Gradual-Change condition （n = 12）, the object brightness changed gradually during moving. In the Random-Change condition （n = 6）, the object brightness changed randomly during moving. Results： In Experiment 1, significant OSPB was found in the no-change condition （OSPB = 28.32ms, p = .006） and the gradual-change condition （OSPB = 29.31ms, p = .004）, but not in the abrupt-change condition （OSPB = -2.57ms, p = .82）. Similar results pattern was also found in Experiment 2. Significant OSPB was found when brightness did not change （OSPB = 78.26ms, p = .001） and when brightness changed gradually （OSPB = 26.74ms, p = .015）, but was not found when brightness change randomly （OSPB = 1.88ms, p = .934）. Conclusion： These results indicate that the continuity of feature change is also necessary for the maintenance of persisting object representations. The present study implies that object file theory may need to include both the continuity of feature change and the continuity of position change to define the spatial temporal continuity.