CAJ | 학술논문

后现代主义的解构向度有合理性，但如果绝对化则造成图书馆学思想的剧烈震荡、深层危机和内在塌陷。汲取后现代和中西哲学的建设性向度，则有利于桥接历史和图书馆学思想断层。我国图书馆学对解构性向度选择性过度解读的根源是客观主义的执着、形而上学的缠绵、伪辩证法的障目。应当提炼中西哲学建设性向度的基本要素，结合图书馆相关理论与实际，提出基于关系型范畴、主体间性和价值论的复合阅读本体论，实现核心理论的重大转移。
후현대주의적해구향도유합이성，단여과절대화칙조성도서관학사상적극렬진탕、심층위궤화내재탑함。급취후현대화중서철학적건설성향도，칙유리우교접역사화도서관학사상단층。아국도서관학대해구성향도선택성과도해독적근원시객관주의적집착、형이상학적전면、위변증법적장목。응당제련중서철학건설성향도적기본요소，결합도서관상관이론여실제，제출기우관계형범주、주체간성화개치론적복합열독본체론，실현핵심이론적중대전이。
The rational in some aspects of deconstruction dimension in Postmodernism will cause violent shake, deep crisis and internal collapse in human thought and library science when it tends to be absolute. The constructive dimension of Postmodernism and Chinese or Western philosophy will bridge the faults in academic history and library science. The excessive interpretation of deconstruction dimension in Postmod- ernism is a daughter of objectivism, metaphysics and fake dialectic. By analyzing viewpoints of construction in philosophy, this article advanced composite reading intercourse ontology based on the relationship cate- gory, intersubjectivity and axiology to brings in basic theory reconstruction, form objective knowledge to intersubiectivity, epistemology to axiology and existentialism, knowledge reading to Composite reading, with intellectuality,moral and aesthetic process. Recommending reading as part of solution to human crisis, the paper try to cure the collective aphasia and follow blindly, advanced a new theory, reconstruct new open academic system after deconstruction, critiqued by postmodernism.