韶关学院学报
韶關學院學報
소관학원학보
Journal of Shaoguan University(Social Science Edition)
2014年
1期
68~71
,共null页
限制 知情 责任承担 简易程序选择权
限製 知情 責任承擔 簡易程序選擇權
한제 지정 책임승담 간역정서선택권
limited; informed; legal liability; the civil right to choose summary procedures
赋予当事人双方民事简易程序选择权并没有超出现实的需要,合理的制度设计是保证其有效运行的前提.民事简易程序选择权应当包括当事人的充分知情、选择作出前的限制规定和选择作出后的责任承担三个完备性条件.基于此,我国民事简易程序选择权应当是建立在充分知情之下当事人双方的一种权利选择,受来自选择作出之前的法定限制并给当事人带来相应的法律后果.
賦予噹事人雙方民事簡易程序選擇權併沒有超齣現實的需要,閤理的製度設計是保證其有效運行的前提.民事簡易程序選擇權應噹包括噹事人的充分知情、選擇作齣前的限製規定和選擇作齣後的責任承擔三箇完備性條件.基于此,我國民事簡易程序選擇權應噹是建立在充分知情之下噹事人雙方的一種權利選擇,受來自選擇作齣之前的法定限製併給噹事人帶來相應的法律後果.
부여당사인쌍방민사간역정서선택권병몰유초출현실적수요,합리적제도설계시보증기유효운행적전제.민사간역정서선택권응당포괄당사인적충분지정、선택작출전적한제규정화선택작출후적책임승담삼개완비성조건.기우차,아국민사간역정서선택권응당시건립재충분지정지하당사인쌍방적일충권리선택,수래자선택작출지전적법정한제병급당사인대래상응적법률후과.
It＇s not beyond the need of reality that giving the parties the civil right to choose summary procedure. It is difficult to guarantee the operation of this system just because the design of the legal framework is not reasonable. Actually, the real civil right to choose summary procedure include fully informed of the parties, the restrictions before the choice and the responsibility after the choice. Therefore, the civil right to choose summary procedure in China is a right choice that established in parties fully informed and limited by the law, it can bring legal consequences to concerned parties.
