CAJ | 학술논문

对西汉四家诗的评说,代有异义.魏源在《诗古微》中,提出了以时间早晚、得《诗》的本义还是旁义来评价其得失的观念.他认为,三家诗早于《毛诗》,得作者的本义,而《毛诗》晚于三家诗,得《诗》之旁义,本义高于旁义,故三家诗高于《毛诗》.此说具有还原《诗》的文学本色及重情、崇情的时代价值.但是,魏源之说充满经学与文学、重本义还是重旁义的矛盾,所以,他又提出齐、鲁、韩、毛同轨合辙的说法.
대서한사가시적평설,대유이의.위원재《시고미》중,제출료이시간조만、득《시》적본의환시방의래평개기득실적관념.타인위,삼가시조우《모시》,득작자적본의,이《모시》만우삼가시,득《시》지방의,본의고우방의,고삼가시고우《모시》.차설구유환원《시》적문학본색급중정、숭정적시대개치.단시,위원지설충만경학여문학、중본의환시중방의적모순,소이,타우제출제、로、한、모동궤합철적설법.
Scholars of different times have voiced different opinions of the four schools of Poetry in Western Han. Wei Quan, in his Interpreting Ancient Poetry （gushi wei）, proposed to evaluate the four schools on the basis of the time of their emergence and whether they grasp the original meaning or the extended meaning. He believed that the Qi, Lu and Han poetry, earlier than the Mao school, get the original meaning of the Poetry, and so they are better than the Mao poetry, which appeared later and got only the extended meaning. His idea helps re-emphasize the Poetry as a literary work of expressing strong human emotions. However, Wei Yuan＇s evaluation did not resolve many contradictions, and he had to conclude that all four schools share the same track and led to the same destination.