CAJ | 학술논문

换喻与隐喻是传统修辞学中的常见修辞手段,现代认知语言学将换喻只看作是隐喻的一个分支,而符号学的研究发现换喻与隐喻不仅是语言运作产生的修辞效果,而且是内在于语言的两种基本的语言运作机制。拉康从索绪尔传统下的符号学出发,结合雅各布森的理论,发现换喻的主要特征是连结,隐喻的主要特征是代替,因此语言本身既是一种换喻,也是一种隐喻。换喻为隐喻意义的产生提供了一个意指语境,是意义产生的必要条件;而隐喻则是意义产生的充分必要条件。
환유여은유시전통수사학중적상견수사수단,현대인지어언학장환유지간작시은유적일개분지,이부호학적연구발현환유여은유불부시어언운작산생적수사효과,이차시내재우어언적량충기본적어언운작궤제。랍강종색서이전통하적부호학출발,결합아각포삼적이론,발현환유적주요특정시련결,은유적주요특정시대체,인차어언본신기시일충환유,야시일충은유。환유위은유의의적산생제공료일개의지어경,시의의산생적필요조건;이은유칙시의의산생적충분필요조건。
Metonymy and metaphor are two common figures of speech in traditional rhetoric. Modern Cognitive Linguistics treats metonymy as a branch of metaphor, while researchers in Semiotics have found that they are not only figures of speech,but also two language mechanisms which are innate in language. Lacan applies the Semiotic theories of Saussure and Jakobson to his psychoanalysis study and finds that metonymy is characterized by contiguity while metaphor by substitution, thus language itself is both a metonymy and a metaphor. In addition, metonymy is the sufficient condition of meaning and provides a signifying context for metaphor, however, metaphor is the necessary and sufficient condition of meaning.