CAJ | 학술논문

假借作为六书之一，在整个六书研究历史中是争议颇多的话题。清代人“假借”学说继承、发展了宋元明学者的“四体二用”说，主要有假借为用字、造字、兼体用三种观点。在主张假借兼体用说的学者中，一派以本字的有无作为造字假借和用字假借区分的标准，并用“通假”来指称用字的假借，另外一派则从字形结构上寻找造字假借的因素。其次，清人对假借与引申的关系有三种主要观点，其中段玉裁的“真假借”理论和朱骏声对假借概念的重新界定影响深远。在实践中，清人的假借研究依然存在一些问题，对引申与假借的关系纠缠不清等。
가차작위육서지일，재정개육서연구역사중시쟁의파다적화제。청대인“가차”학설계승、발전료송원명학자적“사체이용”설，주요유가차위용자、조자、겸체용삼충관점。재주장가차겸체용설적학자중，일파이본자적유무작위조자가차화용자가차구분적표준，병용“통가”래지칭용자적가차，령외일파칙종자형결구상심조조자가차적인소。기차，청인대가차여인신적관계유삼충주요관점，기중단옥재적“진가차”이론화주준성대가차개념적중신계정영향심원。재실천중，청인적가차연구의연존재일사문제，대인신여가차적관계규전불청등。
Substitution, one of the six categories of Chinese characters, remained a much disputable issue in the long-term study categories of Chinese characters. The scholars in the Qing Dynasty carried on and developed the theory of substitution of four styles and two functions advocated by scholars in the Song, the Yuan and the Ming Dy- nasty, concluding the three functions of substitution： word use, word making and concurrent use. Those scholars who specialized in the concurrent function of substitution fell into two groups： one groups took the existence of the words for the standard to distinguish word-use substitution from word-making substitution whereas the other just sought the basis of word-making substitution with reference to formal structure of the word. Moreover, scholars in the Qing Dynasty took three leading views with regard to the relationship between substitution and extension, espe- cially Duan Yucai, who introduced the theory of ＂true and false substitution＂, and Zhu Junsheng, who re-defined the concept of substitution. In Practice, the scholars exposed some problems in their studies of substitution, for ex- ample, their confusion over the relationship between extension and substitution.