心理科学进展
心理科學進展
심이과학진전
Advances In Psychological Science
2014年
4期
588~595
,共null页
社会公正 工具信任 情感信任 结果依赖性 合作行为
社會公正 工具信任 情感信任 結果依賴性 閤作行為
사회공정 공구신임 정감신임 결과의뢰성 합작행위
social justice; instrumental trust; affective trust; outcome dependence; cooperation
胡锦涛在中共十八大上提出:必须坚持维护社会公平正义。对社会公正的认知直接决定着民众的政治信任,进而影响民众对政府的合作。近年来频发的群体性事件即是非合作行为的典型表征。然而,国内外研究中至今没有直接探讨社会公正与政治信任影响合作行为的实证支持,更无法进一步揭示其作用于合作行为的过程和条件。鉴于此,本研究将社会公正分为分配公正和程序公正,将政治信任分为工具信任和情感信任,采用实验室研究、现场研究和问卷调查研究相结合的方法,探讨社会公正对合作行为的过程机制,建立其通过工具信任和情感信任作用于合作行为的双路径模型;并进一步分析结果依赖性对这一路径模型的调节作用。本研究有望提出社会公正与政治信任影响合作行为的双路径模型及其调节变量,一方面在理论上深化和拓展本领域的研究,另一方面实践中通过提升公正感、强化过程变量(政治信任)、干预调节变量(结果依赖性)等策略促进合作行为。
鬍錦濤在中共十八大上提齣:必鬚堅持維護社會公平正義。對社會公正的認知直接決定著民衆的政治信任,進而影響民衆對政府的閤作。近年來頻髮的群體性事件即是非閤作行為的典型錶徵。然而,國內外研究中至今沒有直接探討社會公正與政治信任影響閤作行為的實證支持,更無法進一步揭示其作用于閤作行為的過程和條件。鑒于此,本研究將社會公正分為分配公正和程序公正,將政治信任分為工具信任和情感信任,採用實驗室研究、現場研究和問捲調查研究相結閤的方法,探討社會公正對閤作行為的過程機製,建立其通過工具信任和情感信任作用于閤作行為的雙路徑模型;併進一步分析結果依賴性對這一路徑模型的調節作用。本研究有望提齣社會公正與政治信任影響閤作行為的雙路徑模型及其調節變量,一方麵在理論上深化和拓展本領域的研究,另一方麵實踐中通過提升公正感、彊化過程變量(政治信任)、榦預調節變量(結果依賴性)等策略促進閤作行為。
호금도재중공십팔대상제출:필수견지유호사회공평정의。대사회공정적인지직접결정착민음적정치신임,진이영향민음대정부적합작。근년래빈발적군체성사건즉시비합작행위적전형표정。연이,국내외연구중지금몰유직접탐토사회공정여정치신임영향합작행위적실증지지,경무법진일보게시기작용우합작행위적과정화조건。감우차,본연구장사회공정분위분배공정화정서공정,장정치신임분위공구신임화정감신임,채용실험실연구、현장연구화문권조사연구상결합적방법,탐토사회공정대합작행위적과정궤제,건립기통과공구신임화정감신임작용우합작행위적쌍로경모형;병진일보분석결과의뢰성대저일로경모형적조절작용。본연구유망제출사회공정여정치신임영향합작행위적쌍로경모형급기조절변량,일방면재이론상심화화탁전본영역적연구,령일방면실천중통과제승공정감、강화과정변량(정치신임)、간예조절변량(결과의뢰성)등책략촉진합작행위。
People's perception of social justice affects their political trust, which influences their cooperation with government. Mass incidents, which refer to the conflicts between certain civilians and local administration, are typical non-cooperative behavior in China. However, for the lack of empirical research on the relationship between cooperation and social justice or political trust, there is no investigation on the process and condition on mechanism of cooperation. In this research, social justice is divided into distributive justice and procedural justice, and political trust is divided into instrumental trust and affective trust. This study will focus on social psychological mechanism of social justice and cooperation with the methods of laboratory experiment, field experiment and questionnaire survey, and it aims to construct the dual-pathway model of cooperation by instrumental trust and affective trust. Furthermore, this study will also explore the moderating roles of outcome dependence on the relationship between social justice and cooperation. An important theoretical implication of this study is that it will construct the dual-pathway model of cooperation and its moderate mechanism. Regarding practical implications, this research will examine the social psychological mechanism underlying cooperation with government in China by examining motivation, thus informing administrators and policy makers on how to promote intergroup cooperation in response to public administration.